Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786134›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients in Xiaogan, China: comparison between recent imported cases and earlier local cases.

Yan-Lan Hu, Tao Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan-Lan HuHanchuan People's Hospital Hanchuan 431600, Hubei, China.
Tao DingHanchuan People's Hospital Hanchuan 431600, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectIn this study, we aim to investigate if there exists some change in the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 by comparing the clinical characteristics between recent imported patients and earlier local patients.

methods227 local COVID-19 patients diagnosed before February 15, 2020 (local group) and 23 imported COVID-19 patients diagnosed between July 1, 2020, and January 15, 2021 (imported group) were included in this study. Baseline characteristics and characteristics of computed tomography (CT), routine blood test, liver functions, and infectious markers upon admission were collected and compared.

resultsThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of the imported group was 3.21 ± 1.25, which was significantly higher than that of the local group (2.55 ± 1.19) with a

conclusionThe recent imported cases had higher NLR and C-reactive protein levels than the earlier local cases, indicating that the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 is getting worse during the pandemic.

Indexed as

clinical characteristicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)imported caseslocal cases

Identifiers

PMID34786134
PMCPMC8581891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.