ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
High-quality nursing can reduce the incidence of adverse events in esophageal cancer patients after operation in the intensive care unit and improve postoperative rehabilitation.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of quality nursing care on wound pain and anxiety in burn patients: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Association between hospital volume and mortality after elective oesophageal cancer resection in Switzerland: a retrospective national registry study from 2013 to 2022.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Observational
- Article
- Improving Nursing Care Models is Beneficial for the Perioperative Phase for Esophageal Cancer Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Managements for perioperative anxiety in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Efficacy of High-Quality Nursing Service for the Patients during the Anesthesia Recovery Period: A Meta-Analysis.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis research aimed at observing the effect of applying high-quality nursing in the intensive care unit (ICU) to esophageal cancer (EC) patients after radical resection.
methodsFrom January 2015 to February 2020, 155 EC patients who underwent radical resection were divided into the control group (CG; n=77) and the observation group (OG; n=78). The CG was given conventional nursing intervention, and the OG was given high-quality nursing intervention. The scores of the visual analogue scale (VAS), clinical related indexes, complications, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), nursing satisfaction and SF-36 of patients were compared.
resultsAfter nursing, compared with the CG, the duration of the indwelling drainage tube, time to getting out of bed, recovery of bowel sounds and hospitalization in the OG was shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications was less. In addition, after nursing, the VAS, SAS and SDS scores of patients in both groups decreased, and these indexes in the OG decreased more than those in the CG. Patients were investigated upon discharge, and it was revealed that the nursing satisfaction of patients in the OG was obviously better than that in the CG. Three months after the operation, the scores of general health (GH), mental health (MH), role-physical (RP), role emotional (RE) and vitality (VT) of patients in the OG were higher than those in the CG.
conclusionHigh-quality nursing exerts a better effect in the ICU for patients who underwent EC surgery; it can reduce pain and adverse events and promote rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34786114PMC8581859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.