Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786111›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol on stress response, hemodynamics, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Anbo Yang, Feng Gao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anbo YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital Chongqing 400700, China.
Feng GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Sixth People's Hospital of Chongqing Chongqing 400060, China.
First People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis research was designed to probe the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol on stress response, hemodynamics, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsAltogether 144 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, the Sixth People's Hospital of Chongqing from January 2018 to July 2020 were research subjects. The control group (CG) (n=68) received propofol continuous pumping sedation, while the research group (RG) (n=76) was given dexmedetomidine combined with propofol continuous pumping sedation. The quality of postoperative recovery and incidence of postoperative complications of the two groups were observed and compared. The hemodynamic indexes (HR, SpO

resultsCompared with the CG, the incidence of postoperative complications in the RG was lower, and the quality of postoperative recovery (time of breathing recovery, eye opening, consciousness and extubation) was better. Besides, the hemodynamic indexes of the RG were more stable, and the levels of stress indexes Cortisol, ACTH, and NE were lower. The RG had VAS and SAS scores that were lower, and MMSE scores were higher.

conclusionDexmedetomidine combined with propofol can effectively alleviate the stress response of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, stabilize perioperative hemodynamics, and reduce postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Dexmedetomidinehemodynamicslaparoscopic cholecystectomypropofolstress response

Identifiers

PMID34786111
PMCPMC8581921
OpenAlexW3213479841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.