ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Ultrasound intervention combined with multi-slice spiral CT has excellent diagnostic value in lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application value of gastric contrast ultrasonography in gastric tumors.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of multi-row spiral CT in diagnosing hepatic nodular lesions, gastric cancer, and Crohn's disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with multi-slice helical CT (MSCT) for gastric carcinoma and its lymph node metastasis (LNM).
methods150 patients with gastric carcinoma diagnosed in our hospital from July 2017 to July 2020 were enrolled for this retrospective study. The patients were all confirmed with gastric carcinoma by biopsy pathology. CEUS and MSCT were performed within one week before surgery. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the risk factors for LNM of gastric carcinoma. The diagnostic efficiency of CEUS and MSCT in gastric carcinoma and the screening efficiency of LNM were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated with the postoperative pathologic finding as the gold standard. The scores of lymph node reinforcement were compared.
resultsThere were 115 cases diagnosed with LNM while 35 were diagnosed without it by CEUS. MSCT results confirmed that there were 112 cases with LNM while 38 without. CEUS combined with MSCT confirmed that there were 116 cases with LNM while 34 cases were without. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic coincidence rate of CEUS for LNM of gastric carcinoma were 89.07%, 70.96% and 85.33%, respectively. Those of MSCT were 84.87%, 64.51% and 80.66%, respectively. Those of CEUS combined with MSCT were 94.11%, 87.10%, and 92.67%, respectively. The reinforcement of CEUS combined with MSCT was better than either alone.
conclusionCEUS combined with MSCT is more effective in the diagnosis of LNM in gastric carcinoma patients. Hence, the combination of the two is helpful to enhance the accuracy of LNM diagnosis before operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34786105PMC8581938W3213122163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.