Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786080›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

The effects of the quality nursing mode intervention on the psychological moods, postoperative complications, and nursing satisfaction of breast cancer surgery patients.

Xiaodan He, Xiaoxu Wang, Xin Fu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaodan HeDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Xiaoxu WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Xin FuDepartment of Breast Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute Shenyang 110042, Liaoning Province, China.
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the influence of high-quality care on the psychological well-being, the postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction following a radical mastectomy.

methodsOne hundred and eighteen breast cancer patients who underwent radical mastectomies from February, 2017 to May, 2019 in the Cancer Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled. Among them, 56 patients treated with regular care were included in the regular group, while the other 62 patients who underwent high-quality care were included in the high-quality group. The postoperative recoveries and complications were compared between the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire, the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), the self-rating depression scale (SDS), the quality of life (QOL) assessment scale, and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were used to evaluate the degrees of pain, the upper limb recovery, the negative emotions, the QOL, the patient satisfaction and the two-year survival rate, respectively.

resultsThe ambulation times, the regression times of upper limb swelling, and the hospital stays in the high-quality group were remarkably shorter than they were in the regular group (P<0.05). The postoperative complications were less frequent in the high-quality group (P<0.05). The VAS scores in the high-quality group were lower than they were in the regular group at 1, 3, and 5 days after surgery, and the DASH scores in the high-quality group were lower at 1 month after discharge (P<0.05). The high-quality group showed lower SAS and SDS scores and higher QOL and patient satisfaction than the regular group (all P<0.05). There was no difference in the two-year survival rates between the two groups after the intervention (P>0.05).

conclusionHigh-quality care following a radical mastectomy contributes to postoperative recovery, the relief of negative emotions, the reduction of complications, as well as the enhancement of QOL and patient satisfaction, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Indexed as

breast cancerHigh-quality carequality of lifesurgery

Identifiers

PMID34786080
PMCPMC8581850
OpenAlexW3213495988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.