ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The effects of the quality nursing mode intervention on the psychological moods, postoperative complications, and nursing satisfaction of breast cancer surgery patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating an educational supportive care program on functional status and quality of life among women with breast cancer post-mastectomy in Egypt.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- A novel approach to cancer rehabilitation: assessing the influence of exercise intervention on postoperative recovery and survival rates.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Anxiety Trajectories in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025Article
- Feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a 4-week nurse-led comprehensive rehabilitation program for women after mastectomy: A non-randomized control trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of psychological intervention nursing on the quality of life of breast cancer patients.Gland surgery · 2022Article
- An Evidence-Based Nursing Intervention Decreases Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Quality and Somatic Symptoms of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the influence of high-quality care on the psychological well-being, the postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction following a radical mastectomy.
methodsOne hundred and eighteen breast cancer patients who underwent radical mastectomies from February, 2017 to May, 2019 in the Cancer Hospital of China Medical University were enrolled. Among them, 56 patients treated with regular care were included in the regular group, while the other 62 patients who underwent high-quality care were included in the high-quality group. The postoperative recoveries and complications were compared between the two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire, the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), the self-rating depression scale (SDS), the quality of life (QOL) assessment scale, and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were used to evaluate the degrees of pain, the upper limb recovery, the negative emotions, the QOL, the patient satisfaction and the two-year survival rate, respectively.
resultsThe ambulation times, the regression times of upper limb swelling, and the hospital stays in the high-quality group were remarkably shorter than they were in the regular group (P<0.05). The postoperative complications were less frequent in the high-quality group (P<0.05). The VAS scores in the high-quality group were lower than they were in the regular group at 1, 3, and 5 days after surgery, and the DASH scores in the high-quality group were lower at 1 month after discharge (P<0.05). The high-quality group showed lower SAS and SDS scores and higher QOL and patient satisfaction than the regular group (all P<0.05). There was no difference in the two-year survival rates between the two groups after the intervention (P>0.05).
conclusionHigh-quality care following a radical mastectomy contributes to postoperative recovery, the relief of negative emotions, the reduction of complications, as well as the enhancement of QOL and patient satisfaction, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34786080PMC8581850W3213495988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.