ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The effects of detailed nursing interventions on the safety and stress responses of tumor patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of perioperative cognitive behavioral interventions on pain, anxiety, and sleep quality in elderly patients after sinus floor elevation and immediate implantation: A randomized controlled trial.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023Trial
- Impact of seamless intervention in the operating room combined with pain management on the efficiency of urological laparoscopic surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe overall aim is to study the effect of detailed nursing interventions on the safety and stress responses of tumor patients.
methodsA total of 100 patients who underwent tumor surgery between August 2017 and August 2019 were included and randomized into an experimental group (n=50) and a control group (n=50). Both groups were administered conventional nursing, and based on that, the experimental group was treated with detailed nursing. The two groups were compared in terms of their blood pressure changes, serum norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E), cortisol, nursing quality, and Self-Rating Depression/Anxiety Scale (SDS/SAS) scores. The incidences of adverse reactions and the nursing satisfaction were also compared.
resultsAfter the nursing, the experimental group had better results in their blood pressure levels, stress indexes, nutritional status, and nursing quality (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, lower SDS/SAS scores, fewer accidents, and higher nursing satisfaction were observed in the experimental group (P<0.05). The progression-free survival rates at 6 and 12 months after the operations were significantly higher in the experimental group than that in the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionDetailed nursing interventions can substantially improve the psychological conditions of patients with tumors and diminish their adverse stress responses with a high safety profile, so it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34786065PMC8581874W3212624463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.