ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2021
Biophysical mechanism of the interaction between default mode network and working memory network.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Interference Stimulation Boosts Working Memory Performance in the Frontoparietal Network.Human brain mapping · 2025Trial
- Research on hippocampal positioning and navigation model based on energy fields.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- State-dependent memory mechanisms insights from neural circuits and clinical implications.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- A working memory model based on recurrent neural networks using reinforcement learning.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Evolution of brain network dynamics in early Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- A model of working memory for encoding multiple items and ordered sequences exploiting the theta-gamma code.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Transcerebral information coordination in directional hippocampus-prefrontal cortex network during working memory based on bimodal neural electrical signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Article
- Decreased integration of default-mode network during a working memory task in schizophrenia with severe attention deficits.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Dopamine-Mediated Major Depressive Disorder in the Neural Circuit of Ventral Tegmental Area-Nucleus Accumbens-Medial Prefrontal Cortex: From Biological Evidence to Computational Models.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Complex Dynamics of Noise-Perturbed Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Networks With Intra-Correlative and Inter-Independent Connections.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Identification of Methamphetamine Abstainers by Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Default mode network (DMN) is a functional brain network with a unique neural activity pattern that shows high activity in resting states but low activity in task states. This unique pattern has been proved to relate with higher cognitions such as learning, memory and decision-making. But neural mechanisms of interactions between the default network and the task-related network are still poorly understood. In this paper, a theoretical model of coupling the DMN and working memory network (WMN) is proposed. The WMN and DMN both consist of excitatory and inhibitory neurons connected by AMPA, NMDA, GABA synapses, and are coupled with each other only by excitatory synapses. This model is implemented to demonstrate dynamical processes in a working memory task containing encoding, maintenance and retrieval phases. Simulated results have shown that: (1) AMPA channels could produce significant synchronous oscillations in population neurons, which is beneficial to change oscillation patterns in the WMN and DMN. (2) Different NMDA conductance between the networks could generate multiple neural activity modes in the whole network, which may be an important mechanism to switch states of the networks between three different phases of working memory. (3) The number of sequentially memorized stimuli was related to the energy consumption determined by the network's internal parameters, and the DMN contributed to a more stable working memory process. (4) Finally, this model demonstrated that, in three phases of working memory, different memory phases corresponded to different functional connections between the DMN and WMN. Coupling strengths that measured these functional connections differed in terms of phase synchronization. Phase synchronization characteristics of the contained energy were consistent with the observations of negative and positive correlations between the WMN and DMN reported in referenced fMRI experiments. The results suggested that the coupled interaction between the WMN and DMN played important roles in working memory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-021-09674-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.