Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34786026›Full record

ReviewDer nephrologe2022

[Innovations in peritoneal dialysis].

R Hausinger, C Schmaderer, U Heemann, Q Bachmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der nephrologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R HausingerAbteilung für Nephrologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Deutschland.
C SchmadererAbteilung für Nephrologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Deutschland.
U HeemannAbteilung für Nephrologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Deutschland.
Q BachmannAbteilung für Nephrologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 München, Deutschland.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis used to be a common treatment for acute kidney failure that required dialysis. In favor of continuous, extracorporeal renal replacement procedures, it disappeared from the scene in the western world, whereas it continues to be used in structurally poor countries due to its simplicity and low resource intensity. Recently, the shortages in medical care in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to renewed worldwide interest in peritoneal dialysis as a safe option in acute kidney failure requiring dialysis. The introduction of biocompatible solutions 20 years ago was expected to reduce mortality or technical failure. Unfortunately, so far this could only be implied but not confirmed in studies. Immunomodulatory adjuvants are an innovative option which have the potential to improve the local immunocompetence and prevent the loss of peritoneal function. Currently, the vision of a wearable artificial kidney is getting closer. Intensification of dialysis dose also appears achievable with minimal dialysate volumes. In times of global warming, the regeneration of dialysates could not only save relevant amounts of water but also have a favorable impact on the CO

Indexed as

Acute kidney injury requiring dialysisAlanyl-glutamine supplementationImmunomodulatory adjuvantsPercutaneous catheterizationWearable cyclers

Identifiers

PMID34786026
PMCPMC8588934
OpenAlexW3213973835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.