Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785827›Full record

ArticleTechnology in society2022

Seniors' adoption of digital devices and virtual event platforms in Singapore during Covid-19.

Arif Perdana, Intan Azura Mokhtar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arif PerdanaMonash University, Indonesia.
Intan Azura MokhtarSingapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Singapore Institute of Technology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Singapore, with the nationwide implementation of Covid-19 physical restrictions and safe management measures (SMMs) in place because of the pandemic, the seniors' regular routines and daily social activities have been disrupted. Prior research on seniors' adoption of digital technologies has primarily focused on health-related purposes such as nutrition and exercise and managing old-age related diseases. However, there is limited research done to understand how seniors use digital technologies for other purposes, such as social networks or leisure activities, that can help seniors socialise and reduce loneliness despite ongoing SMMs and restrictions on social distancing and physical interactions because of the Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, the use of virtual event platforms can make it easier for seniors to communicate and socialise with their peers, thus keeping social isolation and loneliness at bay. In this paper, we discuss seniors' relationship with technology, guided by the social exchange theory. We also share the methodological framework that guided this small-scale study on the use of virtual event platforms, along with the research instruments and measurements required for data collection. The research findings of this study, conducted with 144 respondents aged 60 years old and above, are discussed and further analysed with their theoretical contributions and implications for practice.

Indexed as

Covid-19Digital devicesSeniorsSeniors go digitalSingaporeVirtual event platform

Identifiers

PMID34785827
PMCPMC8588606
OpenAlexW3214080302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.