Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785815›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2022

An investigation of healthcare professionals' health beliefs about sportive recreational activities.

Mehmet Pense, Murat Kasımoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet PenseSelcuk University, Konya, Turkey (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Coaching Education).
Murat KasımoğluArven Pharmaceuticals, Konya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, healthcare professionals' beliefs about sportive recreational activities were examined. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted with 940 volunteer healthcare professionals. The

resultsAlthough it was concluded that 72% of the healthcare professionals did not have enough free time, the participation rate in sportive recreational activities reached 71.4%. The study revealed that 44.9% of the participants preferred to engage in sportive recreational activities individually, while 55.1% wanted to do such activities in a group. It was found that 72.9% of the participants took part in sports activities for health-related reasons. The mean health-belief score of the healthcare professionals regarding recreational activities was found to be 80.38 (SD = 10.32). As this score is very close to the maximum value (105.00), it can be stated that their health beliefs are high.

conclusionsIt is understood that participation in sportive recreational activities has positive effects on individuals' physical and mental health; however, there are also some factors that prevent individuals' participation in such activities. The income level, the marital status, the spouse's employment status, having children, and time spent at the place of residence are important factors preventing participation in sportive recreational activities. This study is expected to help individuals gain a perspective about participation in sportive recreational activities, and to provide more evidence in raising the awareness about the protection of individual health. In addition, it is expected to help shape the behaviors aimed at being healthy by improving one's own health-related beliefs. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(2):217-33.

Indexed as

RecreationSportsCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumanshealthhealth beliefhealthcare professionalsleisurerecreationsportive recreational activities

Identifiers

PMID34785815
PMCPMC10464731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.