Trial reportScientific reports2021
EEG and behavioral correlates of attentional processing while walking and navigating naturalistic environments.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preprocessing choices for P3 analyses with mobile EEG: A systematic literature review and interactive exploration.Psychophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Neuroergonomic evaluation of risk-warning eHMI penetration rates in vehicle platoons: effects on pedestrians' mental workload, situation awareness, and gap acceptance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The impact of awareness on affective emoji priming in visual word recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Barefoot walking improves cognitive ability in adolescents.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024Article
- Enhancement of prefrontal functional connectivity under the influence of concurrent physical load during mental tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Investigating cognitive-motor effects during slacklining using mobile EEG.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- The reality of virtual reality.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Human visual processing during walking: Dissociable pre- and post-stimulus influences.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Task-related, intrinsic oscillatory and aperiodic neural activity predict performance in naturalistic team-based training scenarios.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Zapline-plus: A Zapline extension for automatic and adaptive removal of frequency-specific noise artifacts in M/EEG.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Towards real-world neuroscience using mobile EEG and augmented reality.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The capacity to regulate one's attention in accordance with fluctuating task demands and environmental contexts is an essential feature of adaptive behavior. Although the electrophysiological correlates of attentional processing have been extensively studied in the laboratory, relatively little is known about the way they unfold under more variable, ecologically-valid conditions. Accordingly, this study employed a 'real-world' EEG design to investigate how attentional processing varies under increasing cognitive, motor, and environmental demands. Forty-four participants were exposed to an auditory oddball task while (1) sitting in a quiet room inside the lab, (2) walking around a sports field, and (3) wayfinding across a university campus. In each condition, participants were instructed to either count or ignore oddball stimuli. While behavioral performance was similar across the lab and field conditions, oddball count accuracy was significantly reduced in the campus condition. Moreover, event-related potential components (mismatch negativity and P3) elicited in both 'real-world' settings differed significantly from those obtained under laboratory conditions. These findings demonstrate the impact of environmental factors on attentional processing during simultaneously-performed motor and cognitive tasks, highlighting the value of incorporating dynamic and unpredictable contexts within naturalistic designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.