Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785648›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies.

Katharina T Schmid, Barbara Höllbacher, Cristiana Cruceanu, Anika Böttcher, Heiko Lickert, Elisabeth B Binder, Fabian J Theis, Matthias Heinig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The BCGMethodsX · 2025
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina T SchmidInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7082-1099
Barbara HöllbacherInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-7870
Cristiana CruceanuDepartment of Translational Research, Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Anika BöttcherInstitute of Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-3136
Heiko LickertInstitute of Diabetes and Regeneration Research, Helmholtz Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-8825
Elisabeth B BinderDepartment of Translational Research, Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-6618
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-1943
Matthias HeinigInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. matthias.heinig@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5612-1720
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEEmory University · USMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single cell RNA-seq has revolutionized transcriptomics by providing cell type resolution for differential gene expression and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses. However, efficient power analysis methods for single cell data and inter-individual comparisons are lacking. Here, we present scPower; a statistical framework for the design and power analysis of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic experiments. We modelled the relationship between sample size, the number of cells per individual, sequencing depth, and the power of detecting differentially expressed genes within cell types. We systematically evaluated these optimal parameter combinations for several single cell profiling platforms, and generated broad recommendations. In general, shallow sequencing of high numbers of cells leads to higher overall power than deep sequencing of fewer cells. The model, including priors, is implemented as an R package and is accessible as a web tool. scPower is a highly customizable tool that experimentalists can use to quickly compare a multitude of experimental designs and optimize for a limited budget.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeExome SequencingGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansQuantitative Trait LociResearch DesignSample SizeSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34785648
PMCPMC8595682
OpenAlexW3211534834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.