ArticleBMJ open2021
Comparing organ donation decisions for next-of-kin versus the self: results of a national survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification and synthesis of end-of-life decision-making measures: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond individual willingness: family veto, legal knowledge, and the dynamics of organ donation in Türkiye.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Dynamics: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Factors Influencing Organ Donation Decisions: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Body donor programs in Australia and New Zealand: Current status and future opportunities.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Review
- Community-engaged artificial intelligence research: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Complexity of Decision-Making!: Case Studies of Cadaveric Organ Donations in Ahmedabad, India.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Organ Donation: Behaviour and Beliefs in Sweden.SAGE open nursingArticle
- Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on organ pledging in blood donors and nonblood donors in Northern India.Asian journal of transfusion scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIntensive care audits point to family refusal as a major barrier to organ donation. In this study, we sought to understand refusal by accounting for the decision-maker's mindset. This focused on: (1) how decisions compare when made on behalf of a relative (vs the self); and (2) confidence in decisions made for family members.
designCross-sectional survey in Singapore.
settingParticipants were recruited from community settings via door-to-door sampling and community eateries.
participants973 adults who qualified as organ donors in Singapore.
resultsAlthough 68.1% of participants were willing to donate their own organs, only 51.8% were willing to donate a relative's organs. Using machine learning, we found that consistency was predicted by: (1) religion, and (2) fears about organ donation. Conversely, participants who were willing to donate their own organs but not their relative's were less driven by these factors, and may instead have resorted to heuristics in decision-making. Finally, we observed how individuals were overconfident in their decision-making abilities: although 78% had never discussed organ donation with their relatives, the large majority expressed high confidence that they would respect their relatives' wishes on death.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the distinct psychological processes involved when donation decisions are made for family members. Amidst a global shortage of organ donors, addressing the decision-maker's mindset (eg, overconfidence, the use of heuristics) may be key to actualizing potential donors identified in intensive care units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.