Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785543›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

How do health professionals translate evidence on early childhood allergy prevention into health literacy-responsive practice? A protocol for a mixed-method study on the views of German health professionals.

Janina Curbach, Jonas Lander, Marie Luise Dierks, Eva-Maria Grepmeier, Julia von Sommoggy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Health Literacy in Pediatric Consultations on Allergy Prevention.Health literacy research and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janina CurbachDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine/Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg Faculty of Medicine, Regensburg, Germany janina.curbach@ukr.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-233X
Jonas LanderDepartment of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-3307
Marie Luise DierksDepartment of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-6048
Eva-Maria GrepmeierDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine/Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg Faculty of Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-0728
Julia von SommoggyDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine/Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg Faculty of Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-7459
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEOTH Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPaediatricians, general practitioners (GPs) and midwives in primary care are important sources of information for parents on early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP). Research has shown that preventive counselling by health professionals can be effective in improving patients' health literacy (HL) and health behaviour. Providing effective advice relies on two factors. First, health professionals need be up-to-date with research evidence on ECAP, to consider popular misconceptions and fears and to translate this knowledge into clear recommendations for parents (knowledge translation). Second, they need to know and apply counselling techniques and create a practice setting which accommodates parental HL needs (health literacy-responsive care). The objective of this study is to explore and assess how German health professionals take up and translate ECAP evidence into appropriate recommendations for parents, how they consider HL in counselling and practice organisation and what barriers and enablers they find in their performance of HL-responsive ECAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study has a sequential mixed-method design, in two phases. In the first phase, qualitative semi-structured expert interviews will be conducted with health professionals (paediatricians, GPs and midwives) at primary care level and professional policy level. Data collection is ongoing until January 2022. In the second phase, based on the qualitative results, a standardised questionnaire will be developed, and pilot-tested in a wider population of German health professionals. The findings of both phases will be integrated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (18-1205-101). The results will be published in international peer-reviewed open access journals and via presentations at scientific conferences. The results will also be shared with German health professionals, decision-makers and potential funders of interventions.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHypersensitivityChild, PreschoolHealth PersonnelHumansResearch DesignTranslational Science, Biomedicalpreventive medicinepublic healthqualitative researchsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34785543
PMCPMC8596052
OpenAlexW3212722572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.