Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785522›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2022

Employment disruption among women with gynecologic cancers.

Roni Nitecki, Shuangshuang Fu, Kirsten A Jorgensen, Lauren Gray, Carolyn Lefkowits, Benjamin D Smith, Larissa A Meyer, Alexander Melamed, Sharon H Giordano, Pedro T Ramirez and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Climacteric symptoms in postoperative patients among endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, and ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roni NiteckiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA rnitecki@mdanderson.org jarauh@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-9441
Shuangshuang FuDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kirsten A JorgensenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lauren GrayBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Carolyn LefkowitsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Larissa A MeyerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-7463
Alexander MelamedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Sharon H GiordanoDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pedro T RamirezDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jose Alejandro Rauh-HainDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA rnitecki@mdanderson.org jarauh@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
Obstetrical and Oncological Outcomes Among Reproductive Age Women with Gynecological and Breast CancerK08CA234333 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RAUH-HAIN, JOSE ALEJANDRO · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234333NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse employment outcomes pose significant challenges for cancer patients, though data patients with gynecologic cancers are sparse. We evaluated the decrease in employment among patients in the year following the diagnosis of a gynecologic cancer compared with population-based controls.

methodsPatients aged 18 to 63 years old, who were diagnosed with cervical, ovarian, endometrial, or vulvar cancer between January 2009 and December 2017, were identified in Truven MarketScan, an insurance claims database of commercially insured patients in the USA. Patients working full- or part-time at diagnosis were matched to population-based controls in a 1:4 ratio via propensity score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of employment disruption in patients versus controls.

resultsWe identified 7446 women with gynecologic cancers (191 vulvar, 941 cervical, 1839 ovarian, and 4475 endometrial). Although most continued working following diagnosis, 1579 (21.2%) changed from full- or part-time employment to long-term disability, retirement, or work cessation. In an adjusted model, older age, the presence of comorbidities, and treatment with surgery plus adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone were associated with an increased risk of employment disruption (p<0.0003, p=0.01, and p<0.0001, respectively) among patients with gynecologic cancer. In the propensity-matched cohort, patients with gynecologic cancers had over a threefold increased risk of employment disruption relative to controls (HR 3.67, 95% CI 3.44 to 3.95).

conclusionApproximately 21% of patients with gynecologic cancer experienced a decrease in employment in the year after diagnosis. These patients had over a threefold increased risk of employment disruption compared with controls.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleAdultCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMiddle Agedcervical cancerovarian cancerquality of life (PRO)/palliative careuterine cancervulvar and vaginal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34785522
PMCPMC9035315
OpenAlexW3213372349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.