Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34785394›Full record

ReviewMolecular metabolism2022

Toward modeling metabolic state from single-cell transcriptomics.

Karin Hrovatin, David S Fischer, Fabian J Theis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karin HrovatinInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany; TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 8, Freising, 85354, Germany. Electronic address: karin.hrovatin@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
David S FischerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany; TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 8, Freising, 85354, Germany. Electronic address: david.fischer@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany; TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 8, Freising, 85354, Germany; Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, Garching bei München, 85748, Germany. Electronic address: fabian.theis@helmholtz-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-cell metabolic studies bring new insights into cellular function, which can often not be captured on other omics layers. Metabolic information has wide applicability, such as for the study of cellular heterogeneity or for the understanding of drug mechanisms and biomarker development. However, metabolic measurements on single-cell level are limited by insufficient scalability and sensitivity, as well as resource intensiveness, and are currently not possible in parallel with measuring transcript state, commonly used to identify cell types. Nevertheless, because omics layers are strongly intertwined, it is possible to make metabolic predictions based on measured data of more easily measurable omics layers together with prior metabolic network knowledge. SCOPE OF REVIEW: We summarize the current state of single-cell metabolic measurement and modeling approaches, motivating the use of computational techniques. We review three main classes of computational methods used for prediction of single-cell metabolism: pathway-level analysis, constraint-based modeling, and kinetic modeling. We describe the unique challenges arising when transitioning from bulk to single-cell modeling. Finally, we propose potential model extensions and computational methods that could be leveraged to achieve these goals. MAJOR

conclusionsSingle-cell metabolic modeling is a rising field that provides a new perspective for understanding cellular functions. The presented modeling approaches vary in terms of input requirements and assumptions, scalability, modeled metabolic layers, and newly gained insights. We believe that the use of prior metabolic knowledge will lead to more robust predictions and will pave the way for mechanistic and interpretable machine-learning models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalTranscriptomeKineticsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysConstraint-based modelingKinetic modelingMetabolic modelingPathway analysisSingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID34785394
PMCPMC8829761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.