Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784978›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2021

Online residency training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of otolaryngology head and neck surgery program directors.

Jade Chénard-Roy, Matthieu J Guitton, François Thuot

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Otolaryngology in the face of A pandemic.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jade Chénard-RoyDépartement d'ophtalmologie et d'oto-rhino-laryngologie - chirurgie cervico-faciale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 4889, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Matthieu J GuittonDépartement d'ophtalmologie et d'oto-rhino-laryngologie - chirurgie cervico-faciale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 4889, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
François ThuotDépartement d'ophtalmologie et d'oto-rhino-laryngologie - chirurgie cervico-faciale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Local 4889, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. francois.thuot@fmed.ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-589X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted healthcare and education systems, including resident education. The impact of the pandemic on the different types of pedagogical activities, and the displacement of pedagogical activities to online modalities have not yet been quantified. We sought to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on formal pedagogic components of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORL-HNS) residency, the switch to distance learning and program director's perceptions of the future of teaching and learning.

methodsA nationwide online survey was conducted on Canadian ORL-HNS program directors. The use of standard didactic activities in-person and online, before and during the pandemic was rated with Likert scales. Perceptions of the pandemic were described with open-ended questions.

resultsA total of 11 of the 13 program directors contacted responded. The analysis were conducted using nonparametric statistics. There was a significant drop in overall didactic activities during the pandemic, regardless of the teaching format (3.5 ± 0.2 to 3.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.05). The most affected activities were simulation and in-house lectures. Online activities increased dramatically (0.5 ± 0.2 to 5.0 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), including attendance to lectures made by other programs (0.5 ± 0.3 to 4.0 ± 0.8, p < 0.05). Respondents stated their intention to maintain the hybrid online and in-person teaching model.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that hybrid online and in-person teaching is likely to persist in the post-pandemic setting. A balanced residency curriculum requires diversity in academic activities. The pandemic can have positive consequences if higher education institutions work to better support distance teaching and learning.

Indexed as

CurriculumAdolescentAdultCanadaChildCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleOtolaryngologyPandemicsEducationOnline teachingOtolaryngologyProgram directorsResidencyResident

Identifiers

PMID34784978
PMCPMC8593638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.