Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784959›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2021

Barriers and facilitators for integration of guidelines on operating health shops: a case of family planning services.

Joseph M Zulu, Doreen Sitali, Zubin Cyrus Shroff, Geetanjali Lamba, George Sichone, Charles Michelo, Chileshe H Mpandamabula, Wesely Mwambazi, Cecilia Mwenda, Malizgani P Chavula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strengthening health systems: the role of drug shops.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  7. Drug shops for stronger health systems: learning from initiatives in six LMICs.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph M ZuluDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia. josephmumbazulu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-4977
Doreen SitaliDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
Zubin Cyrus ShroffAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Science Division, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Geetanjali LambaAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Science Division, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
George SichoneParticipatory Research and Innovations Management, Lusaka, Zambia.
Charles MicheloSchool of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chileshe H MpandamabulaRigor Data Research, Lusaka, Zambia.
Wesely MwambaziThe Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority, Lusaka, Zambia.
Cecilia MwendaThe Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority, Lusaka, Zambia.
Malizgani P ChavulaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, PO Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
University of Zambia · ZMWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA) piloted the implementation of Guidelines on Operating Health Shops in Zambia in 2016, with a view to making basic medicines more accessible to communities. The guidelines aim to transform ordinary drug shops into health shops, which are dispensing facilities permitted to sell a ZAMRA-prescribed list of medicines over the counter. However, studies that explore the integration and uptake of guidelines into the health system are lacking. This study aims to inform future improved implementation of these guidelines by examining the current acceptability of guidelines within the Zambian health system, especially in relation to family planning services. METHODOLOGY: Data collected through documentary review, key informant interviews with district pharmacists, staff from ZAMRA and in-depth interviews with 24 health shop owners and dispensers were analyzed using thematic analysis. A conceptual framework on the integration of health innovations into health systems guided the analysis.

resultsThe Guidelines on Operating Health Shops were implemented to address the problem of inadequate access to quality medicines especially in rural areas. Factors that facilitated the acceptability of the guidelines included their perceived relevance and simplicity, comprehensive training and improved knowledge among health shop operators on the guidelines, development of a governance and reporting structure or steering committee at the national level as well as perceived improved health outcomes at the community level. Factors that hindered acceptability of the guidelines included the high cost of implementing them, a restricted list of drugs which affected consumer choice, limited communication between the local council and the operators of health shops, health shop owners not owning the health shop premises restricting their ability to adapt the building, and cultural norms which constrained uptake of family planning services.

conclusionIn addition to training, facilitating the acceptability of the guidelines among health shop owners requires paying attention to operational issues such as location, ownership of the shop, size of infrastructure as well as financial costs of implementing guidelines through decentralizing the registration process and thus reducing the cost of registration. It is also important to have effective communication strategies between operators and the regulators of health shops.

Indexed as

GuidelinesHealth shopsHealth systemIntegrationZambia

Identifiers

PMID34784959
PMCPMC8594102
OpenAlexW3212140001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.