ReviewCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry2021
Carbon Monoxide as a Therapeutic for Airway Diseases: Contrast and Comparison of Various CO Delivery Modalities.
Review in Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Gas and Inhaled Pharmacologic Interventions During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Systematic Review.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Biotin-mediated drug delivery: does the biotin transporter mediate uptake of biotin conjugates?Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Compelling Evidence: A Critical Update on the Therapeutic Potential of Carbon Monoxide.Medicinal research reviews · 2025Review
- Carbon monoxide potentiates the effect of corticosteroids in suppressing inflammatory responses in cell culture.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Plight of CORMs: The unreliability of four commercially available CO-releasing molecules, CORM-2, CORM-3, CORM-A1, and CORM-401, in studying CO biology.Biochemical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Toward "CO in a Pill": Silica-Immobilized Organic CO Prodrugs for Studying the Feasibility of Systemic Delivery of CO viaMolecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Carbon Monoxide Signaling: Examining Its Engagement with Various Molecular Targets in the Context of Binding Affinity, Concentration, and Biologic Response.Pharmacological reviews · 2022Review
- Activated charcoal dispersion of carbon monoxide prodrugs for oral delivery of CO in a pill.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Heme Oxygenase-1: An Anti-Inflammatory Effector in Cardiovascular, Lung, and Related Metabolic Disorders.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The quest to find novel strategies to tackle respiratory illnesses has led to the exploration of the potential therapeutic effects of carbon monoxide (CO) as an endogenous signaling molecule and a cytoprotective agent. Further, several studies have demonstrated the pharmacological efficacy of CO in animal models of respiratory disorders, such as acute lung injury and pulmonary hypertension. Because of the gaseous nature of CO and its affinity for multiple targets, its controlled delivery has been a challenge. Past studies have employed different delivery modalities, including CO gas, HO-1 inducers, and CO donors, sometimes leading to substantive variations in the resulting pharmacological effects for various reasons. Herein, this review summarizes and analyzes the differences among the profiles of various CO-delivery modalities in terms of their efficacy, dosing regimen, and pharmacokinetics in airways models. We believe that analysis of these issues will help in understanding the fundamental roles of CO in airways, and eventually, contribute to its development as a medicine for respiratory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.