Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784632›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Intraoperative Assessment of Endogenous Microbiota in the Breast.

Henrique Stachon, Vanessa Amoroso, Cicero Urban, Pamela Bioni, Cleverton Spautz, Rubens Silveira de Lima, Karina Anselmi, Flávia Kuroda, Iris Rabinovich, Thabata Alvarez and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mammary Gland Microbiota in Benign Breast Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrique StachonPostgraduate Program, Biotechnology, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Vanessa AmorosoBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-8044
Cicero UrbanPostgraduate Program, Biotechnology, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8964-9487
Pamela BioniBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Cleverton SpautzBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-8419
Rubens Silveira de LimaBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2452-0476
Karina AnselmiBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6316-2512
Flávia KurodaBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-5062
Iris RabinovichBreast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-0630
Thabata AlvarezPostgraduate Program, Biotechnology, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9814-0797
Juliane MonteiroMicrobiology Laboratory, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1797-0623
Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças · BRUniversidade Positivo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBreast surgery is considered a clean surgery; however, the rates of infection range between 3 and 15%. The objective of the present study was to intraoperatively investigate the presence of autochthonous microbiota in the breast.

methodsPieces of breast tissue collected from 49 patients who underwent elective breast surgery (reconstructive, diagnostic, or oncologic) were cultured. The pieces of breast tissue were approximately 1 cm in diameter and were removed from the retroareolar area, medial quadrant, and lateral quadrant. Each piece of tissue was incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 7 days at 37°C, and in cases in which the medium became turbid due to microorganism growth, the samples were placed in Petri dishes for culturing and isolating strains and for identifying species using an automated counter.

resultsMicroorganism growth was observed in the samples of 10 of the 49 patients (20.4%) and in 11 of the 218 pieces of tissue (5%). The detected species were

conclusionThe presence of these bacteria in breast tissue in approximately 20% of the patients in this series suggests that breast surgery should be considered a potential source of contamination that may have implications for adverse reactions to breast implants and should be studied in the near future for their oncological implications in breast implant-associated large-cell lymphoma etiology.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsMicrobiotaBacteriaBreastHumans

Identifiers

PMID34784632
PMCPMC10183903
OpenAlexW3214570022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.