Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784539›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2022

Deformable MR-CT image registration using an unsupervised, dual-channel network for neurosurgical guidance.

R Han, C K Jones, J Lee, P Wu, P Vagdargi, A Uneri, P A Helm, M Luciano, W S Anderson, J H Siewerdsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Medical image registration and its application in retinal images: a review.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
C K JonesThe Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
J LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
P WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
P VagdargiDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
A UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
P A HelmMedtronic Inc., Littleton, MA, United States.
M LucianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
W S AndersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
J H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; The Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: Hokyong.Shon-1@uts.edu.au.

Funding

Imaging, Guidance, and QA for Emerging High-Precision Neurosurgical TechniquesU01NS107133 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H, UNERI, ALI · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS107133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe accuracy of minimally invasive, intracranial neurosurgery can be challenged by deformation of brain tissue - e.g., up to 10 mm due to egress of cerebrospinal fluid during neuroendoscopic approach. We report an unsupervised, deep learning-based registration framework to resolve such deformations between preoperative MR and intraoperative CT with fast runtime for neurosurgical guidance.

methodThe framework incorporates subnetworks for MR and CT image synthesis with a dual-channel registration subnetwork (with synthesis uncertainty providing spatially varying weights on the dual-channel loss) to estimate a diffeomorphic deformation field from both the MR and CT channels. An end-to-end training is proposed that jointly optimizes both the synthesis and registration subnetworks. The proposed framework was investigated using three datasets: (1) paired MR/CT with simulated deformations; (2) paired MR/CT with real deformations; and (3) a neurosurgery dataset with real deformation. Two state-of-the-art methods (Symmetric Normalization and VoxelMorph) were implemented as a basis of comparison, and variations in the proposed dual-channel network were investigated, including single-channel registration, fusion without uncertainty weighting, and conventional sequential training of the synthesis and registration subnetworks.

resultsThe proposed method achieved: (1) Dice coefficient = 0.82±0.07 and TRE = 1.2 ± 0.6 mm on paired MR/CT with simulated deformations; (2) Dice coefficient = 0.83 ± 0.07 and TRE = 1.4 ± 0.7 mm on paired MR/CT with real deformations; and (3) Dice = 0.79 ± 0.13 and TRE = 1.6 ± 1.0 mm on the neurosurgery dataset with real deformations. The dual-channel registration with uncertainty weighting demonstrated superior performance (e.g., TRE = 1.2 ± 0.6 mm) compared to single-channel registration (TRE = 1.6 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.05 for CT channel and TRE = 1.3 ± 0.7 mm for MR channel) and dual-channel registration without uncertainty weighting (TRE = 1.4 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.05). End-to-end training of the synthesis and registration subnetworks also improved performance compared to the conventional sequential training strategy (TRE = 1.3 ± 0.6 mm). Registration runtime with the proposed network was ∼3 s.

conclusionThe deformable registration framework based on dual-channel MR/CT registration with spatially varying weights and end-to-end training achieved geometric accuracy and runtime that was superior to state-of-the-art baseline methods and various ablations of the proposed network. The accuracy and runtime of the method may be compatible with the requirements of high-precision neurosurgery.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresUncertaintyDeformable registrationImage synthesisInter-modality registrationUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34784539
PMCPMC10229200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.