Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784510›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens - the Aviary Transect method.

Guro Vasdal, Joanna Marchewka, Ruth C Newberry, Inma Estevez, Kathe Kittelsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. PsittaWel: A welfare assessment tool for companion parrots.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of Precision Feeding to Enhance Broiler Growth Performance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Welfare of broilers on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Guro VasdalNorwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo 0513, Norway. Electronic address: guro.vasdal@animalia.no.
Joanna MarchewkaInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, Magdalenka 05-552, Poland.
Ruth C NewberryNorwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, Ås 1432, Norway.
Inma EstevezNeiker-Tecnalia, Arkaute Agrifood Campus, Animal Production, P.O. Box 46, Vitoria-Gasteiz E-01080, Spain; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain.
Kathe KittelsenNorwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo 0513, Norway.
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOPolish Academy of Sciences · PLTecnalia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared welfare assessment results in aviary flocks using 3 approaches: 1) A novel Aviary Transect method, 2) AssureWel, and 3) the Norwegian farm advisors' NorWel method. The Aviary Transect time requirement, interobserver reliability, and within- and across-house sensitivity to detect welfare indicators were also evaluated. The study was conducted on 6 randomly chosen commercial white-strain layer flocks of similar age and flock size, kept in multitiered aviaries. The Aviary Transect method comprised standardized walks along each aisle while screening the whole flock for 12 welfare indicators: feather loss (FL) on head, back, breast, and tail, wounds on head, back, tail, and feet, dirty birds, enlarged crop, sick birds, and dead birds. AssureWel involved scoring FL on head and back, and dirtiness of 50 random birds, and flock-level evaluation of beak trimming, antagonistic behavior, flightiness, birds needing further care, and mortality. NorWel involved scoring 8 welfare indicators on 50 random birds: FL on head, back, breast, and tail, dirtiness, and wounds on head, back, and tail. The AssureWel detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the back (P < 0.01) as well as somewhat dirty birds (P < 0.01). The NorWel method detected flock differences in both minor and major FL on the head (P < 0.01), back (P < 0.001), breast (P < 0.001), and tail (P < 0.001) and somewhat (score 1) dirty birds (P < 0.05). The Aviary Transect method detected flock differences in FL on head, back, breast, and tail (all P < 0.001), dirty birds (P < 0.05) and enlarged crop (P < 0.001). More birds with FL on breast, and more dirty birds, were found in wall vs. central transects (P < 0.05). There was good interobserver agreement, except for dirty birds (P < 0.01), and positive correlations (P < 0.05) were identified between the Aviary Transect method and the other sampling methods for FL on head and back, and dirtiness. The three methods took similar time to complete (about 20 min/flock). In conclusion, all 3 methods detected significant differences in welfare indicator prevalence between flocks. The new Aviary Transect method provides egg producers with an efficient and sensitive whole-flock assessment of hen welfare status in multitiered aviaries.

Indexed as

BeakChickensAnimalsFemaleReproducibility of Resultsanimal welfareaviary housinglaying hentransect samplingwelfare assessment methodology

Identifiers

PMID34784510
PMCPMC8605232
OpenAlexW3207184427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.