ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
PhacoTrainer: A Multicenter Study of Deep Learning for Activity Recognition in Cataract Surgical Videos.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of annotation for surgical process model analysis in minimally invasive surgery based on video.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Bibliometric analysis of deep learning for surgical instrument segmentation, detection and tracking in minimally invasive surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for posterior capsule opacification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Performance of automated machine learning in detecting fundus diseases based on ophthalmologic B-scan ultrasound images.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Beyond PhacoTrainer: Deep Learning for Enhanced Trabecular Meshwork Detection in MIGS Videos.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Comparing code-free and bespoke deep learning approaches in ophthalmology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Advancing Glaucoma Care: Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis, Management, and Progression Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Anterior Segment Diseases: A Review of Potential Developments and Clinical Applications.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- PhacoTrainer: Deep Learning for Cataract Surgical Videos to Track Surgical Tools.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To build and evaluate deep learning models for recognizing cataract surgical steps from whole-length surgical videos with minimal preprocessing, including identification of routine and complex steps. Methods: We collected 298 cataract surgical videos from 12 resident surgeons across 6 sites and excluded 30 incomplete, duplicated, and combination surgery videos. Videos were downsampled at 1 frame/second. Trained annotators labeled 13 steps of surgery: create wound, injection into the eye, capsulorrhexis, hydrodissection, phacoemulsification, irrigation/aspiration, place lens, remove viscoelastic, close wound, advanced technique/other, stain with trypan blue, manipulating iris, and subconjunctival injection. We trained two deep learning models, one based on the VGG16 architecture (VGG model) and the second using VGG16 followed by a long short-term memory network (convolutional neural network [CNN]- recurrent neural network [RNN] model). Class activation maps were visualized using Grad-CAM. Results: Overall top 1 prediction accuracy was 76% for VGG model (93% for top 3 accuracy) and 84% for the CNN-RNN model (97% for top 3 accuracy). The microaveraged area under receiver-operating characteristic curves was 0.97 for the VGG model and 0.99 for the CNN-RNN model. The microaveraged average precision score was 0.83 for the VGG model and 0.92 for the CNN-RNN model. Class activation maps revealed the model was appropriately focused on the instrumentation used in each step to identify which step was being performed. Conclusions: Deep learning models can classify cataract surgical activities on a frame-by-frame basis with remarkably high accuracy, especially routine surgical steps. Translational Relevance: An automated system for recognition of cataract surgical steps could provide to residents automated feedback metrics, such as the length of time spent on each step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.