ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2021
Spiking Characteristics of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Direction-Selective Ganglion Cells of Rabbit and Mouse Retinas to Electric Stimulation for Retinal Prostheses.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective protection of photoreceptors using an inflammation-responsive hydrogel to attenuate outer retinal degeneration.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Electrically-evoked responses for retinal prostheses are differentially altered depending on ganglion cell types in outer retinal neurodegeneration caused byFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Editorial: Neuromodulation and neural technologies for sight restoration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To restore the sight of individuals blinded by outer retinal degeneration, numerous retinal prostheses have been developed. However, the performance of those implants is still hampered by some factors including the lack of comprehensive understanding of the electrically-evoked responses arising in various retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types. In this study, we characterized the electrically-evoked network-mediated responses (hereafter referred to as electric responses) of ON-OFF direction-selective (DS) RGCs in rabbit and mouse retinas for the first time. Interestingly, both species in common demonstrated strong negative correlations between spike counts of electric responses and direction selective indices (DSIs), suggesting electric stimulation activates inhibitory presynaptic neurons that suppress null direction responses for high direction tuning in their light responses. The DS cells of the two species showed several differences including different numbers of bursts. Also, spiking patterns were more heterogeneous across DS RGCs of rabbits than those of mice. The electric response magnitudes of rabbit DS cells showed positive and negative correlations with ON and OFF light response magnitudes to preferred direction motion, respectively. But the mouse DS cells showed positive correlations in both comparisons. Our Fano Factor (FF) and spike time tiling coefficient (STTC) analyses revealed that spiking consistencies across repeats were reduced in late electric responses in both species. Moreover, the response consistencies of DS RGCs were lower than those of non-DS RGCs. Our results indicate the species-dependent retinal circuits may result in different electric response features and therefore suggest a proper animal model may be crucial in prosthetic researches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.