Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784278›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2021

Automatic Identification of Axon Bundle Activation for Epiretinal Prosthesis.

Pulkit Tandon, Nandita Bhaskhar, Nishal Shah, Sasi Madugula, Lauren Grosberg, Victoria H Fan, Pawel Hottowy, Alexander Sher, Alan M Litke, E J Chichilnisky and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inference of Electrical Stimulation Sensitivity from Recorded Activity of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. High-Fidelity Reproduction of Visual Signals by Electrical Stimulation in the Central Primate Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pulkit Tandon
Nandita Bhaskhar
Nishal Shah
Sasi Madugula
Lauren Grosberg
Victoria H Fan
Pawel Hottowy
Alexander Sher
Alan M Litke
E J Chichilnisky
Subhasish Mitra
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USAGH University of Krakow · PLStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Patterned Electrical Stimulation of the Retina for High-Resolution ProsthesesR01EY021271 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDUARDO CHICHILNISKY · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRetinal prostheses must be able to activate cells in a selective way in order to restore high-fidelity vision. However, inadvertent activation of far-away retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) through electrical stimulation of axon bundles can produce irregular and poorly controlled percepts, limiting artificial vision. In this work, we aim to provide an algorithmic solution to the problem of detecting axon bundle activation with a bi-directional epiretinal prostheses.

methodsThe algorithm utilizes electrical recordings to determine the stimulation current amplitudes above which axon bundle activation occurs. Bundle activation is defined as the axonal stimulation of RGCs with unknown soma and receptive field locations, typically beyond the electrode array. The method exploits spatiotemporal characteristics of electrically-evoked spikes to overcome the challenge of detecting small axonal spikes.

resultsThe algorithm was validated using large-scale, single-electrode and short pulse, ex vivo stimulation and recording experiments in macaque retina, by comparing algorithmically and manually identified bundle activation thresholds. For 88% of the electrodes analyzed, the threshold identified by the algorithm was within ±10% of the manually identified threshold, with a correlation coefficient of 0.95.

conclusionThis works presents a simple, accurate and efficient algorithm to detect axon bundle activation in epiretinal prostheses. SIGNIFICANCE: The algorithm could be used in a closed-loop manner by a future epiretinal prosthesis to reduce poorly controlled visual percepts associated with bundle activation. Activation of distant cells via axonal stimulation will likely occur in other types of retinal implants and cortical implants, and the method may therefore be broadly applicable.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisAxonsElectric StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID34784278
PMCPMC8860174
OpenAlexW3212615362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.