Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784172›Full record

ArticleACS nano2021

Water Nanoconfined in a Hydrophobic Pore: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Transmembrane Protein 175 and the Influence of Water Models.

Charlotte I Lynch, Gianni Klesse, Shanlin Rao, Stephen J Tucker, Mark S P Sansom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Water will Find Its Way: Transport through Narrow Tunnels in Hydrolases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating Polarizable Biomembrane Simulations against Experiments.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. When is a hydrophobic gate not a hydrophobic gate?The Journal of general physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte I LynchDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3QU.ORCID 0000-0001-6619-6331
Gianni KlesseClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3PU.
Shanlin RaoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3QU.
Stephen J TuckerClarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3PU.ORCID 0000-0001-8996-2000
Mark S P SansomDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3QU.ORCID 0000-0001-6360-7959

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000145/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208361/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water molecules within biological ion channels are in a nanoconfined environment and therefore exhibit behaviors which differ from that of bulk water. Here, we investigate the phenomenon of hydrophobic gating, the process by which a nanopore may spontaneously dewet to form a "vapor lock" if the pore is sufficiently hydrophobic and/or narrow. This occurs without steric occlusion of the pore. Using molecular dynamics simulations with both rigid fixed-charge and polarizable (AMOEBA) force fields, we investigate this wetting/dewetting behavior in the transmembrane protein 175 ion channel. We examine how a range of rigid fixed-charge and polarizable water models affect wetting/dewetting in both the wild-type structure and in mutants chosen to cover a range of nanopore radii and pore-lining hydrophobicities. Crucially, we find that the rigid fixed-charge water models lead to similar wetting/dewetting behaviors, but that the polarizable water model resulted in an increased wettability of the hydrophobic gating region of the pore. This has significant implications for molecular simulations of nanoconfined water, as it implies that polarizability may need to be included if we are to gain detailed mechanistic insights into wetting/dewetting processes. These findings are of importance for the design of functionalized biomimetic nanopores (

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationNanoporesHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIon ChannelsWaterIon ChannelsWaterhydrophobic gatingion channelnanoconfinementpolarizabilitytransmembrane protein 175water

Identifiers

PMID34784172
PMCPMC7612143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.