Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784107›Full record

ArticleClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2022

Auditory brainstem response prior to MRI compared to standalone MRI in the detection of vestibular schwannoma: A modelling study.

Stan R W Wijn, Mayke A Hentschel, Andy J Beynon, Henricus P M Kunst, Maroeska M Rovers

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Clinical characteristics of acoustic neuroma patients with normal hearing].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  2. Auditory brainstem response prior to MRI compared to standalone MRI in the detection of vestibular schwannoma: A modelling study.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stan R W WijnDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3782-6677
Mayke A HentschelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6106-089X
Andy J BeynonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3191-6113
Henricus P M KunstDepartment of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-6394
Maroeska M RoversDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3095-170X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the cost-effectiveness of auditory brainstem response prior to MRI (ABR-MRI) compared to standalone MRI to diagnose vestibular schwannoma.

designA state transition model was developed to simulate costs and effects (quality-adjusted life years [QALY]) for both diagnostic strategies for patients suspected of a vestibular schwannoma. Model input was derived from literature, hospital databases and expert opinions. Scenario and sensitivity analyses addressed model uncertainty.

resultsOver a lifetime horizon, ABR-MRI resulted in a limited cost-saving of €68 or €98 per patient (dependent on MRI sequence) and a health loss of 0.005 QALYs over standalone MRI. ABR-MRI, however, did miss patients with other important pathology (2% of the population) that would have been detected when using standalone MRI. In total, €14 203 or €19 550 could be saved per lost QALY if ABR-MRI was used instead of standalone MRI. The results were sensitive to the detection rate of vestibular schwannoma and health-related quality of life of missed patients.

conclusionThe cost-saving with ABR-MRI does not seem to outweigh the number of missed patients with VS and other important pathologies that would have been detected when using standalone MRI.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroma, Acousticauditory brainstem responsecost-effectiveness analysisdiagnosticmagnetic resonance imagingvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID34784107
PMCPMC9298692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.