Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784102›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Anode Material Options Toward 500 Wh kg

Chen-Xi Bi, Meng Zhao, Li-Peng Hou, Zi-Xian Chen, Xue-Qiang Zhang, Bo-Quan Li, Hong Yuan, Jia-Qi Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Co-doped g-CNanoscale advances · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Anode Material Options Toward 500 Wh kgAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen-Xi BiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Meng ZhaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8402-7697
Li-Peng HouSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Zi-Xian ChenSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xue-Qiang ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2856-1881
Bo-Quan LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-5795
Hong YuanSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7565-2204
Jia-Qi HuangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-9186
Beijing Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation JQ20004National Natural Science Foundation of China 22075029National Natural Science Foundation of China 22109007ShanXi Science and Technology Department 20191102003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery is identified as one of the most promising next-generation energy storage systems due to its ultra-high theoretical energy density up to 2600 Wh kg

Indexed as

high energy densitylithium-magnesium alloyslithium metal anodeslithium-sulfur batteriespouch cells

Identifiers

PMID34784102
PMCPMC8805573
OpenAlexW3211387507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.