Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34784056›Full record

Trial reportCancer2022

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920.

Hamid Emamekhoo, Mark R Olsen, Bradley C Carthon, Alexandra Drakaki, Ivor J Percent, Ana M Molina, Daniel C Cho, Johanna C Bendell, Lucio N Gordan, Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02982954 (Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02982954 phase4completednot on this map

Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC (CheckMate 920: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 920)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2017 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Brain metastasis: Opportunities for novel therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Efficacy and CNS Toxicity of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Rare Cancer Brain Metastases: A Multicenter Basket Trial Analysis (NCI/SWOG S1609).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Navigating the Complexities of Brain Metastases Management.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Hamid EmamekhooUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-8703
Mark R OlsenOklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Bradley C CarthonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.
Alexandra DrakakiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Institute of Urologic Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
Ivor J PercentFlorida Cancer Specialists, Port Charlotte, Florida.
Ana M MolinaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Daniel C ChoPerlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Johanna C BendellSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee.
Lucio N GordanFlorida Cancer Specialists North/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Gainesville, Florida.
Arash Rezazadeh KalebastyNorton Cancer Institute, Louisville, Kentucky.
Daniel J GeorgeDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Thomas E HutsonTexas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas.
Edward R ArrowsmithSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Joshua ZhangBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Jesus ZocoSyneos Health, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium.
Jennifer L JohansenBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
David K LeungBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
Scott S TykodiUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USSarah Cannon · USBryan College · USCornell University · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University Hospital Midtown · USFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USNorton Healthcare · USNYU Langone Health · USOklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute · USSyneos Health (United States) · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety in patients with previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Although most phase 3 clinical trials exclude patients with brain metastases, the ongoing, multicohort phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial (ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT02982954) evaluated the safety and efficacy of NIVO + IPI in a cohort that included patients with aRCC and brain metastases, as reported here.

methodsPatients with previously untreated aRCC and asymptomatic brain metastases received NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of the last dose of study drug. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (both determined by the investigator). Exploratory end points included overall survival, among others.

resultsAfter a minimum follow-up of 24.5 months (N = 28), no grade 5 imAEs occurred. The most common grade 3 and 4 imAEs were diarrhea/colitis (n = 2; 7%) and hypophysitis, rash, hepatitis, and diabetes mellitus (n = 1 each; 4%). The objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 14.9%-53.5%) with a median duration of response of 24.0 months; 4 of 8 responders remained without reported progression. Seven patients (25%) had intracranial progression. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 2.9-12.0 months), and the median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 14.1 months to not estimable).

conclusionsIn patients who had previously untreated aRCC and brain metastases-a population with a high unmet medical need that often is underrepresented in clinical trials-the approved regimen of NIVO + IPI followed by NIVO showed encouraging antitumor activity and no new safety signals.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansIpilimumabNivolumabIpilimumabNivolumabaRCCbrain metastasesintracranialipilimumabnivolumabrenal cell carcinomaunmet need

Identifiers

PMID34784056
PMCPMC9298991
OpenAlexW3213138676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.