ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2021
Management of Maternal Complex Congenital Heart Disease During Pregnancy.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal and Obstetric Complications Among Pregnant Women With Congenital Heart Disease in a Georgia Medicaid Dataset.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Pregnancy- the ultimate cardiovascular stress test.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Common Clinical Scenarios in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Practical Guide for General Cardiologists.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
- Racial Disparities in Breastfeeding Rates in Patients with Heart Disease.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Pregnancy outcomes among patients with complex congenital heart disease.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Article
- Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Single-Center Experience and Review of Current Literature.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThe purpose of this review is to discuss the risk stratification and management of pregnancy in women with complex congenital heart disease. RECENT
findingsClassifying congenital heart defects (CHD) including both anatomy and physiology is important for maternal risk stratification. Although most women with CHD can tolerate the physiological challenge of pregnancy, some may experience serious risks both to their health and that of their foetus. The WHO maternal risk classification model remains the best-validated risk measure. Ideally, women with CHD should have pre-conception assessment with a CHD cardiologist. General principles of management, such as need for expert centre delivery, a multidisciplinary team, epidural and mode of delivery are based on WHO risk in combination with expert assessment of status. CHD is increasingly prevalent in women of child-bearing age. Assessment by an adult CHD cardiologist, ideally pre-conception, is key in assessing and minimising risk to mother and foetus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.