Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783948›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2022

Targeted treatments of AL and ATTR amyloidosis.

Pranav Chandrashekar, Anish K Desai, Barry H Trachtenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Future Directions in Cardiac Amyloidosis.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pranav ChandrashekarAmyloidosis Center, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Anish K DesaiDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Barry H TrachtenbergMethodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA. btrachtenberg@houstonmethodist.org.
Oregon Health & Science University · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape for cardiac amyloidosis is rapidly evolving. In the last decade, our focus has shifted from dealing with the inevitable complications of continued extracellular infiltration of amyloid fibrils to earlier identification of these patients with prompt initiation of targeted therapy to prevent further deposition. Although much of the focus on novel targeted therapies is within the realm of transthyretin amyloidosis, light chain amyloidosis has benefited due to an overlap particularly in the final common pathway of fibrillogenesis and extraction of amyloid fibrils from the heart. Here, we review the targeted therapeutics for transthyretin and light chain amyloidosis. For transthyretin amyloidosis, the list of current and future therapeutics continues to evolve; and therefore, it is crucial to become familiar with the underlying mechanistic pathways of the disease. Although targeted therapeutic choices in AL amyloidosis are largely driven by the hematology team, the cardiac adverse effect profiles of these therapies, particularly in those with advanced amyloidosis, provide an opportunity for early recognition to prevent decompensation and can help inform recommendations regarding therapy changes when required.

Indexed as

Amyloid Neuropathies, FamilialCardiomyopathiesImmunoglobulin Light-chain AmyloidosisAmyloidHumansPrealbuminAmyloidPrealbuminTTR protein, humanAmyloidosisCardiomyopathyLight chainTargeted therapeuticsTransthyretin

Identifiers

PMID34783948
OpenAlexW3212447774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.