Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783946›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Microsatellite and RAS/RAF Mutational Status as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Marco Tonello, Dario Baratti, Paolo Sammartino, Andrea Di Giorgio, Manuela Robella, Cinzia Sassaroli, Massimo Framarini, Mario Valle, Antonio Macrì, Luigina Graziosi and 18 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis of Rectal Origin.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Effect ofGastroenterology report · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Marco TonelloUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Dario BarattiPeritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Paolo SammartinoCytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Di GiorgioSurgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Manuela RobellaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Cinzia SassaroliColorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Massimo FramariniGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Mario VallePeritoneal Malignancies Unit, INT "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
Antonio MacrìPeritoneal Surface Malignancy and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Program, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Luigina GraziosiGeneral and Emergency Surgery Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Federico CoccoliniGeneral Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Piero Vincenzo LippolisGeneral and Peritoneal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital University Pisa (AOUP), Pisa, Italy.
Roberta GelminiGeneral and Oncological Surgery Unit, AOU of Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Marcello DeracoPeritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Daniele BiacchiCytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Unit, Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco SantulloSurgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco VairaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Katia Di LauroDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio D'AcapitoGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Fabio CarboniPeritoneal Malignancies Unit, INT "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe GiuffrèDepartment of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age 'Gaetano Barresi', Section of Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Annibale DoniniGeneral and Emergency Surgery Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Paola FugazzolaGeneral Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Pinuccia FavianaPathological Anatomy III, Laboratory Medicine Department, Hospital University Pisa (AOUP), Pisa, Italy.
Lorena SorrentinoGeneral and Oncological Surgery Unit, AOU of Modena University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Antonio ScapinelloPathology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Paola Del BiancoClinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Antonio SommarivaUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy. antonio.sommariva@iov.veneto.it.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITOspedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to prolonged survival for selected patients with colorectal (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic role of micro-satellite (MS) status and RAS/RAF mutations for patients treated with CRS.

methodsData were collected from 13 Italian centers with PM expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Clinical and pathologic variables and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational and MS status were correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

resultsThe study enrolled 437 patients treated with CRS-HIPEC. The median OS was 42.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.4-51.2 months], and the median DFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 12.3-14.9 months). The local (peritoneal) DFS was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.4-24.6 months). In addition to the known clinical factors, KRAS mutations (p = 0.005), BRAF mutations (p = 0.01), and MS status (p = 0.04) were related to survival. The KRAS- and BRAF-mutated patients had a shorter survival than the wild-type (WT) patients (5-year OS, 29.4% and 26.8% vs 51.5%, respectively). The patients with micro-satellite instability (MSI) had a longer survival than the patients with micro-satellite stability (MSS) (5-year OS, 58.3% vs 36.7%). The MSI/WT patients had the best prognosis. The MSS/WT and MSI/mutated patients had similar survivals, whereas the MSS/mutated patients showed the worst prognosis (5-year OS, 70.6%, 48.1%, 23.4%; p = 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, OS was related to the Peritoneal Cancer Index [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05 per point], completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (HR, 2.8), N status (HR, 1.6), signet-ring (HR, 2.4), MSI/WT (HR, 0.5), and MSS/WT-MSI/mutation (HR, 0.4). Similar results were obtained for DFS.

conclusionFor patients affected by CRC-PM who are eligible for CRS, clinical and pathologic criteria need to be integrated with molecular features (KRAS/BRAF mutation). Micro-satellite status should be strongly considered because MSI confers a survival advantage over MSS, even for mutated patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesSurvival RateProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID34783946
OpenAlexW3213568704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.