Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783916›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Width and thickness of the gingiva in periodontally healthy individuals in a central Indian population: a cross-sectional study.

Pradeep S Anand, Abhinav Bansal, Balaji R Shenoi, Kavitha P Kamath, Namitha P Kamath, Sukumaran Anil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Matrix WaveCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025
    Review
  5. Gingival thickness and gingival width in children: a cross-sectional study utilizing ultrasonography.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pradeep S AnandDepartment of Dentistry, ESIC Medical College, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500038, India. deepusanand@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-2928
Abhinav BansalDepartment of Periodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Madhya Pradesh, Gandhinagar, Bhopal, 462036, India.
Balaji R ShenoiDepartment of Dentistry, Mount Zion Medical College, Adoor, Kerala, 691556, India.
Kavitha P KamathDepartment of Dental Research Cell, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5826-3028
Namitha P KamathDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-4914
Sukumaran AnilDepartment of Dentistry, Oral Health Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-8780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study was performed to determine the gingival dimensions (width and thickness) among young individuals in a central Indian population. MATERIALS AND

methodsPeriodontal probing depth, width of the keratinized and attached gingiva, and gingival thickness were recorded on maxillary and mandibular teeth from central incisor to first molar unilaterally in 75 systemically healthy individuals (32 males and 43 females; 19-30 years of age). Comparisons were made gender-wise, arch-wise, tooth-wise, and site-wise using either the Student's t test or the ANOVA.

resultsKeratinized and attached gingiva were wider in the maxilla than in the mandible both at proximal and at mid-buccal aspects (p < 0.001). At the tooth level also, gingiva was wider at the maxillary teeth than the corresponding mandibular teeth and at proximal aspects than at the mid-buccal aspect (p < 0.001). Regarding the thickness, gingiva was thicker among males, in the mandible, and at inter-proximal sites (p < 0.001). In either arch, maximum thickness was observed at the incisor region and least at the canine region.

conclusionsDimensions of the gingival tissues vary between different populations and between different areas of the dentition within the same subject. These variations need to be better understood because these aspects may have an important bearing on periodontal treatment planning as width and thickness of gingiva are important in terms of maintenance of periodontal health. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The dimensions of the clinically healthy gingiva are important in clinical practice as they can influence the progression of periodontal disease as well as impact the outcome of periodontal and restorative and orthodontic therapy.

Indexed as

GingivaMandibleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncisorMaleMaxillaAttached gingivaGingivaGingival biotypeGingival dimensionsGingival thicknessKeratinized gingivaMandibleMaxillaProbing depth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.