Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783907›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Navigated African American breast cancer patients as incidental change agents in their family/friend networks.

Yamilé Molina, Shaila M Strayhorn, Nyahne Q Bergeron, Desmona C Strahan, Dana Villines, Veronica Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth A Calhoun, Marian L Fitzgibbon, Sage J Kim, Karriem S Watson and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Integration of Value Assessment and Social Network Methods for Breast Health Navigation Among African Americans.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Oncology Nurses' Role in Promoting Patient Self-Advocacy.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2022
    Article
  7. Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yamilé MolinaMile Square Health Center, Chicago, IL, USA. ymolin2@uic.edu.
Shaila M StrayhornUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Nyahne Q BergeronUniversity of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., MC 923, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Desmona C StrahanUniversity of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., MC 923, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Dana VillinesAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Veronica FitzpatrickAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Elizabeth A CalhounUniversity of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Marian L FitzgibbonUniversity of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., MC 923, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Sage J KimUniversity of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W. Taylor St., MC 923, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Karriem S WatsonNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Aditya S KhannaBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Assessing and modeling network-level consequences of patient navigationR21CA215252 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KHANNA, ADITYA SUBHASH, MOLINA, YAMILE · 2018 to 2019
$401k
NCI NIH HHS R21CA215242NCI NIH HHS R21 CA215252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient navigation is an increasingly widespread intervention to address the persistent, severe, and disproportionate breast cancer (BC) burden that African Americans (AA) face. Navigation may have more widespread effects than previously estimated due to patient-driven diffusion of BC information.

methodsThis pilot study examined the network effects of a randomized controlled trial via recruitment of navigated and non-navigated AA BC patients as well as their network members. We estimated study arm differences in patient BC promotion (i.e., number of individuals to whom BC patients promote BC screening) and network BC screening (i.e., % BC screening among network members).

resultsAmong our sample of 100 AA BC patients, navigated patients promoted BC screening to more individuals than non-navigated patients. BC patients were more likely to promote BC screening to children and individuals with whom they communicated more frequently. Some models further suggested more network BC screening among "navigated" network members relative to "non-navigated" network members.

conclusionsNavigated AA patients promoted BC screening more widely throughout their networks than non-navigated AA BC patients. There were also suggestive findings regarding increased BC screening among their network members. Our pilot study highlights the potential for social network analysis to improve the precision of intervention effect estimates and to inform future innovations (e.g., integrating navigation and network-based interventions) with multilevel effects on cancer health disparities.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient NavigationBlack or African AmericanChildFemaleFriendsHumansPilot ProjectsAfrican AmericanPatient navigationSocial networksSurvivor advocates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.