Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783896›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Time-based task expectancy: perceptual task indicator expectancy or expectancy of post-perceptual task components?

Irina Monno, Stefanie Aufschnaiter, Sonja Ehret, Andrea Kiesel, Edita Poljac, Roland Thomaschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irina MonnoCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany. irina.monno@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-7853
Stefanie AufschnaiterCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Sonja EhretCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Andrea KieselCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Edita PoljacCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Roland ThomaschkeCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 1772Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TH 1554/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporal predictability of upcoming events plays a crucial role in the adjustment of anticipatory cognitive control in multitasking. Previous research has demonstrated that task switching performance improved if tasks were validly predictable by a pre-target interval. Hence, far, the underlying cognitive processes of time-based task expectancy in task switching have not been clearly defined. The present study investigated whether the effect of time-based expectancy is due to expectancy of post-perceptual task components or rather due to facilitation of perceptual visual processing of the coloured task indicator. Participants performed two numeric judgment tasks (parity vs. magnitude), which were each indicated by two different colours. Each task was either more or less frequently preceded by one of two intervals (500 ms or 1500 ms). Tasks were indicated either by colours that were each more frequently (or in Exp. 1 also less frequently) paired with the interval or by colours that were equally frequent for each interval. Participants only responded faster when colour and task were predictable by time (expected colour), not when the task alone was predictable (neutral colour). Hence, our results speak in favour of perceptual time-based task indicator expectancy being the underlying cognitive mechanism of time-based expectancy in the task switching paradigm.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionCognitionHumansJudgmentReaction TimeForeperiodTask switchingTemporal preparationTime-based expectancy

Identifiers

PMID34783896
PMCPMC9177471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.