Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783168›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

A modified delineation method of para-aortic nodal clinical target volume in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Dunhuang Wang, Weiping Wang, Xiaoliang Liu, Kang Ren, Yongguang Liang, Qizhen Zhu, Fuquan Zhang, Ke Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dunhuang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Weiping WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoliang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kang RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-6372
Yongguang LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qizhen ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-2320
Ke HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo validate the nodal center coverage (NCC) of the three mainstream delineation methods of para-aortic nodal clinical target volume (CTV) and propose a modified delineation method of para-aortic nodal CTV in prophylactic extended-field irradiation (EFI) of cervical cancer.

methodsA total of 106 patients with para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) identified on PET/CT were included at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2011 and 2020. PALNs were classified as left lateral para-aortic (LLPA), aorto-caval (AC), and right para-caval (RPC). Distances from the nodal center to the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) were measured. The NCC of the three mainstream delineation methods of para-aortic nodal CTV (CTV-K, CTV-S, and CTV-D) and a modified CTV (CTV-M) was calculated. Radiotherapy plans were created based on 4 CTVs for 10 selected patients who received prophylactic EFI. The chi-squared test and the Student's t-test were performed.

resultsWe identified 344 PALNs (216 LLPA, 101 AC, and 27 RPC) in 106 patients. Mean distance from the nodal center to the aorta was 9.6 mm in the LLPA and 7 mm in the AC and from the nodal center to the IVC was 5.6 mm in the AC and 5.6 mm in the RPC. CTV-D improved the NCC of 98% compared with 92% for CTV-K (p = 0.002) and 95% for CTV-S (p = 0.046). CTV-M provided the same satisfactory NCC as CTV-D (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.485). The V

conclusionCTV-D provided more satisfactory NCC than CTV-K and CTV-S. CTV-M provided the same satisfactory NCC as CTV-D and reduced the dose to the critical structures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageUterine Cervical Neoplasmscervical cancerpara-aortic lymph nodepara-aortic nodal CTVPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID34783168
PMCPMC8704148
OpenAlexW3212515681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.