Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783071›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2022

Clinical and genomic features of SPOP-mutant prostate cancer.

Mari Nakazawa, Mike Fang, Catherine H Marshall, Tamara L Lotan, Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Emmanuel S Antonarakis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mari NakazawaDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-8960
Mike FangDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-1016
Catherine H MarshallDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2653-4110
Tamara L LotanDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-9067
Pedro Isaacsson VelhoDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3117-7031
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDepartment of Oncology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0031-9655
Johns Hopkins University · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInactivating missense mutations in the SPOP gene, encoding speckle-type poxvirus and zinc-finger protein, are one of the most common genetic alterations in prostate cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively identified 72 consecutive prostate cancer patients with somatic SPOP mutations, through next-generation sequencing analysis, who were treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. We evaluated clinical and genomic characteristics of this SPOP-mutant subset.

resultsSPOP alterations were clustered in the MATH domain, with hotspot mutations involving the F133 and F102 residues. The most frequent concurrent genetic alterations were in APC (16/72 [22%]), PTEN (13/72 [18%]), and TP53 (11/72 [15%]). SPOP-mutant cancers appeared to be mutually exclusive with tumors harboring the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, and were significantly enriched for Wnt pathway (APC, CTNNB1) mutations and de-enriched for TP53/PTEN/RB1 alterations. Patients with mtSPOP had durable responses to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a median time-to-castration-resistance of 42.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.7-60.8) months. However, time-to-castration-resistance was significantly shorter in SPOP-mutant patients with concurrent TP53 mutations (hazard ratio [HR] 4.53; p = 0.002), HRD pathway (ATM, BRCA1/2, and CHEK2) mutations (HR 3.19; p = 0.003), and PI3K pathway (PTEN, PIK3CA, and AKT1) alterations (HR 2.69; p = 0.004). In the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting, median progression-free survival was 8.9 (95% CI, 6.7-NR) months on abiraterone and 7.3 (95% CI, 3.2-NR) months on enzalutamide. There were no responses to PARP inhibitor treatment.

conclusionsSPOP-mutant prostate cancers represent a unique subset with absent ERG fusions and frequent Wnt pathway alterations, with potentially greater dependency on androgen signaling and enhanced responsiveness to ADT. Outcomes are best for SPOP-altered patients without other concurrent mutations.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsDisease ProgressionGene FusionHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseNuclear ProteinsProgression-Free SurvivalRepressor ProteinsSerine EndopeptidasesTranscriptional Regulator ERGTreatment OutcomeWnt Signaling PathwayAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsERG protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSerine EndopeptidasesSPOP protein, humanTMPRSS2 protein, humanTranscriptional Regulator ERGpredictive biomarkersRNA sequencingsomatic mutationsSPOP

Identifiers

PMID34783071
PMCPMC8688331
OpenAlexW3211749669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.