Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34783038›Full record

ReviewJournal of marital and family therapy2022

Helping couples achieve relationship success: A decade of progress in couple relationship education research and practice, 2010-2019.

Howard J Markman, Alan J Hawkins, Scott M Stanley, W Kim Halford, Galena Rhoades

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of marital and family therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Understanding Who Benefits Most from Family-Based Prevention: Differential Intervention Effects for Families with Low Income.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Professional psychology, research and practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Couple communication in cancer: A tale of two conceptual models.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Howard J MarkmanPsychology Department, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0050-6426
Alan J HawkinsSchool of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-802X
Scott M StanleyPsychology Department, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
W Kim HalfordSchool of Psychology, University of Queenstown, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-9147
Galena RhoadesPsychology Department, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article systematically reviewed 34 rigorous evaluation studies of couple relationship education (CRE) programs from 2010 to 2019 that met the criteria for Level 1 well-established interventions. Significant advances include reaching more diverse and disadvantaged target populations with positive intervention effects on a wider range of outcomes beyond relationship quality, including physical and mental health, coparenting, and even child well-being, and evidence that high-risk couples often benefit the most. In addition, considerable progress has been made delivering effective online CRE, increasing services to individuals rather than to couples, and giving greater attention to youth and young adults to teach them principles and skills that may help them form healthy relationships. Ongoing challenges include expanding our understanding of program moderators and change mechanisms, attending to emerging everyday issues facing couples (e.g., healthy breaking ups, long-distance relationships) and gaining increased institutional support for CRE.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentChildHumansYoung Adultcouples < populationsdiversity < populationsevidence-based < theory/modelintervention/technique < clinicalpractice development < professional/practice issuesreview of literature < research

Identifiers

PMID34783038
PMCPMC9298911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.