ReviewGlobal health & medicine2021
Testing, diagnosis of viral hepatitis, and the follow-up policy in Japan.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategy for Hepatitis B and C Virus Testing Campaigns Through Web Services and Digital Advertising in Japan: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study With Correspondence Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Lessons learned from viral hepatitis testing that inform law and policy responses to steatotic liver disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Continuity of long-term follow-up in patients with chronic hepatitis C after sustained virologic response following direct-acting antiviral therapy: a nationwide real-world multicenter cohort study in Japan.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Higher FIB-4 index at baseline predicts development of liver cancer in a community-based cohort with viral hepatitis.Global health & medicine · 2024Article
- Messages from Japan policy for viral hepatitis.Global health & medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral hepatitis is one of the major infectious diseases in Japan and causes liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. Therefore, screening for hepatitis viruses was started in 2002, based on the geriatric health care program. The screening plan has now been transferred to the Health Promotion Project and it is estimated that more than half of the population has been tested for hepatitis viruses. The Basic Act on Hepatitis Measures was enacted in 2009 and the Basic Guidelines for Promotion of Control Measures for hepatitis was issued in 2011. It reported that there were about 770,000 positive people who were unaware that they were infected, and about 0.5 to 1.2 million positive people who knew they were infected but did not continue to receive medical examinations. Ten years have passed since that report and it is estimated that the number of hepatitis virus-positive individuals who need medical examination/treatment is decreasing. Therefore, in order to eradicate viral hepatitis, it is essential to identify areas and age groups in which hepatitis virus testing is inadequate, to encourage people to undergo testing and to promptly send positive patients to hepatologists for continued medical care. This review describes the current status and challenges of hepatitis virus testing measures in Japan, led by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and the promotion of visits to medical institutions by positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.