Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782772›Full record

ArticleNature plants2021

The cryo-EM structure of the chloroplast ClpP complex.

Ning Wang, Yifan Wang, Qian Zhao, Xiang Zhang, Chao Peng, Wenjuan Zhang, Yanan Liu, Olivier Vallon, Michael Schroda, Yao Cong and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ning Wang *State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yifan Wang *College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-682X
Qian ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-4467
Xiang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chao PengNational Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, CAS, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-4037
Wenjuan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanan LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Olivier VallonInstitut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Michael SchrodaMolecular Biotechnology & Systems Biology, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Yao CongState Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. cong@sibcb.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-8694
Cuimin LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cmliu@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-4804
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology · CNShanghai Advanced Research Institute · CNSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein homoeostasis in plastids is strategically regulated by the protein quality control system involving multiple chaperones and proteases, among them the Clp protease. Here, we determined the structure of the chloroplast ClpP complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by cryo-electron microscopy. ClpP contains two heptameric catalytic rings without any symmetry. The top ring contains one ClpR6, three ClpP4 and three ClpP5 subunits while the bottom ring is composed of three ClpP1

Indexed as

ChaperoninsChloroplastsChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCryoelectron MicroscopyChaperonins

Identifiers

PMID34782772
OpenAlexW3212053275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.