Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782726›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2022

Phenotyping clonal populations of glioma stem cell reveals a high degree of plasticity in response to changes of microenvironment.

James A Innes, Andrew S Lowe, Raquel Fonseca, Natasha Aley, Tedani El-Hassan, Myrianni Constantinou, Joanne Lau, Ayad Eddaoudi, Silvia Marino, Sebastian Brandner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A2B5 Expression in Central Nervous System and Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James A InnesDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Andrew S LoweDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Raquel FonsecaDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Natasha AleyDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Tedani El-HassanDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Myrianni ConstantinouBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, E1 2AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1103-0067
Joanne LauDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Ayad EddaoudiZayed Centre for Research Into Rare Disease in Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1DZ, UK.
Silvia MarinoBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, E1 2AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9612-2883
Sebastian BrandnerDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. s.brandner@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9821-0342
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBMRC Prion Unit · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23615Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenotype of glioma-initiating cells (GIC) is modulated by cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic factors. Phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of GIC is an important limitation to therapeutic approaches targeting cancer stem cells. Plasticity also presents a challenge to the identification, isolation, and propagation of purified cancer stem cells. Here we use a barcode labelling approach of GIC to generate clonal populations over a number of passages, in combination with phenotyping using the established stem cell markers CD133, CD15, CD44, and A2B5. Using two cell lines derived from isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, we identify a remarkable heterogeneity of the phenotypes between the cell lines. During passaging, clonal expansion manifests as the emergence of a limited number of barcoded clones and a decrease in the overall number of clones. Dual-labelled GIC are capable of forming traceable clonal populations which emerge after as few as two passages from mixed cultures and through analyses of similarity of relative proportions of 16 surface markers we were able to pinpoint the fate of such populations. By generating tumour organoids we observed a remarkable persistence of dominant clones but also a significant plasticity of stemness marker expression. Our study presents an experimental approach to simultaneously barcode and phenotype glioma-initiating cells to assess their functional properties, for example to screen newly established GIC for tumour-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedClone CellsFlow CytometryGliomaHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsImmunophenotypingLewis X AntigenMicroscopy, ConfocalNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorHyaluronan ReceptorsLewis X Antigen

Identifiers

PMID34782726
PMCPMC8784315
OpenAlexW3214535932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.