Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782697›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A low-cost open-source 5-choice operant box system optimized for electrophysiology and optophysiology in mice.

Sampath K T Kapanaiah, Bastiaan van der Veen, Daniel Strahnen, Thomas Akam, Dennis Kätzel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sampath K T KapanaiahInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. sampath.kapanaiah@uni-ulm.de.
Bastiaan van der VeenInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel StrahnenInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas Akam *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Dennis Kätzel *Institute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. dennis.kaetzel@uni-ulm.de.
Technische Hochschule Ulm · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KA 4594/2-1Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung GSO/EKFS 12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operant boxes enable the application of complex behavioural paradigms to support circuit neuroscience and drug discovery research. However, commercial operant box systems are expensive and often not optimised for combining behaviour with neurophysiology. Here we introduce a fully open-source Python-based operant-box system in a 5-choice design (pyOS-5) that enables assessment of multiple cognitive and affective functions. It is optimized for fast turn-over between animals, and for testing of tethered mice for simultaneous physiological recordings or optogenetic manipulation. For reward delivery, we developed peristaltic and syringe pumps based on a stepper motor and 3D-printed parts. Tasks are specified using a Python-based syntax implemented on custom-designed printed circuit boards that are commercially available at low cost. We developed an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) and task definition scripts to conduct assays assessing operant learning, attention, impulsivity, working memory, or cognitive flexibility, alleviating the need for programming skills of the end user. All behavioural events are recorded with millisecond resolution, and TTL-outputs and -inputs allow straightforward integration with physiological recordings and closed-loop manipulations. This combination of features realizes a cost-effective, nose-poke-based operant box system that allows reliable circuit-neuroscience experiments investigating correlates of cognition and emotion in large cohorts of subjects.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionConditioning, OperantElectrophysiological PhenomenaAnimalsLearningMemoryMiceReaction TimeReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID34782697
PMCPMC8593009
OpenAlexW3211739290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.