Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782557›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2022

Application of neurotrophic and proangiogenic factors as therapy after peripheral nervous system injury.

Kamilla Faritovna Idrisova, Alina Kazymovna Zeinalova, Galina Andreevna Masgutova, Alexey Andreevich Bogov, Cinzia Allegrucci, Valeriia Yurievna Syromiatnikova, Ilnur Ildusovich Salafutdinov, Ekaterna Evgenievna Garanina, Dina Ivanovna Andreeva, Adilet Abdullaatovich Kadyrov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peptide-Incorporated Biomaterials Promote Regeneration of Peripheral Nerve Injuries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Rewiring the Spine-Cutting-Edge Stem Cell Therapies for Spinal Cord Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kamilla Faritovna IdrisovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Alina Kazymovna ZeinalovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Galina Andreevna MasgutovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Alexey Andreevich BogovRepublican Clinical Hospital, Kazan, Russia.
Cinzia AllegrucciBiodiscovery Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Valeriia Yurievna SyromiatnikovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Ilnur Ildusovich SalafutdinovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Ekaterna Evgenievna GaraninaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Dina Ivanovna AndreevaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Adilet Abdullaatovich KadyrovDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Kazan State Medical Academy, Kazan, Russia.
Albert Anatolevich RizvanovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Ruslan Faridovich MasgutovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University; Republican Clinical Hospital, Kazan, Russia.
Kazan Federal University · RUKazan State Medical Academy · RURepublican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan · RUUniversity of Nottingham · GBWeatherford College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic ability of peripheral nerves to regenerate after injury is extremely limited, especially in case of severe injury. This often leads to poor motor function and permanent disability. Existing approaches for the treatment of injured nerves do not provide appropriate conditions to support survival and growth of nerve cells. This drawback can be compensated by the use of gene therapy and cell therapy-based drugs that locally provide an increase in the key regulators of nerve growth, including neurotrophic factors and extracellular matrix proteins. Each growth factor plays its own specific angiotrophic or neurotrophic role. Currently, growth factors are widely studied as accelerators of nerve regeneration. Particularly noteworthy is synergy between various growth factors, that is essential for both angiogenesis and neurogenesis. Fibroblast growth factor 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor are widely known for their proangiogenic effects. At the same time, fibroblast growth factor 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor stimulate neural cell growth and play an important role in neurodegenerative diseases of the peripheral nervous system. Taken together, their neurotrophic and angiogenic properties have positive effect on the regeneration process. In this review we provide an in-depth overview of the role of fibroblast growth factor 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor in the regeneration of peripheral nerves, thus demonstrating their neurotherapeutic efficacy in improving neuron survival in the peripheral nervous system.

Indexed as

fibroblast growth factor 2growth factorsnerve growth factorperipheral nerve injuryperipheral nervous systemvascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID34782557
PMCPMC8643040
OpenAlexW3213412838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.