Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782554›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2022

Retinal regeneration requires dynamic Notch signaling.

Leah J Campbell, Jaclyn L Levendusky, Shannon A Steines, David R Hyde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. eLife · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Temporal Transcriptomic Profiling of the DevelopingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah J CampbellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Zebrafish Research, Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Jaclyn L LevenduskyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Zebrafish Research, Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Shannon A SteinesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Zebrafish Research, Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
David R HydeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Zebrafish Research, Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
University of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogrammingU01EY027267 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BLACKSHAW, SETH, HYDE, DAVID R · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
Roles of TNFa and Notch to Initiate Retinal Regeneration from Muller gliaR01EY024519 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI HYDE, DAVID R · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024519NEI NIH HHS U01 EY027267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal damage in the adult zebrafish induces Müller glia reprogramming to produce neuronal progenitor cells that proliferate and differentiate into retinal neurons. Notch signaling, which is a fundamental mechanism known to drive cell-cell communication, is required to maintain Müller glia in a quiescent state in the undamaged retina, and repression of Notch signaling is necessary for Müller glia to reenter the cell cycle. The dynamic regulation of Notch signaling following retinal damage also directs proliferation and neurogenesis of the Müller glia-derived progenitor cells in a robust regeneration response. In contrast, mammalian Müller glia respond to retinal damage by entering a prolonged gliotic state that leads to additional neuronal death and permanent vision loss. Understanding the dynamic regulation of Notch signaling in the zebrafish retina may aid efforts to stimulate Müller glia reprogramming for regeneration of the diseased human retina. Recent findings identified DeltaB and Notch3 as the ligand-receptor pair that serves as the principal regulators of zebrafish Müller glia quiescence. In addition, multi-omics datasets and functional studies indicate that additional Notch receptors, ligands, and target genes regulate cell proliferation and neurogenesis during the regeneration time course. Still, our understanding of Notch signaling during retinal regeneration is limited. To fully appreciate the complex regulation of Notch signaling that is required for successful retinal regeneration, investigation of additional aspects of the pathway, such as post-translational modification of the receptors, ligand endocytosis, and interactions with other fundamental pathways is needed. Here we review various modes of Notch signaling regulation in the context of the vertebrate retina to put recent research in perspective and to identify open areas of inquiry.

Indexed as

differentiationgliosisMόller glianeuronal progenitor cellNotch signalingproliferationquiescenceretinal developmentretinal regenerationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34782554
PMCPMC8643038
OpenAlexW3214621174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.