Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782439›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics.

Catherine Manning, Cameron D Hassall, Laurence T Hunt, Anthony M Norcia, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Margaret J Snowling, Gaia Scerif, Nathan J Evans

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reduced categorical learning of faces in dyslexia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine ManningDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG c.a.manning@reading.ac.uk.
Cameron D HassallDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX c.a.manning@reading.ac.uk.
Laurence T HuntDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-8533
Anthony M NorciaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, US.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-3821
Eric-Jan WagenmakersFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margaret J SnowlingDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG.
Gaia ScerifDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG.
Nathan J EvansSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia.
University of Oxford · GBAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLStanford University · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877Wellcome Trust 204685Wellcome Trust 204685/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 208789/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with and without dyslexia differ in their behavioral responses to visual information, particularly when required to pool dynamic signals over space and time. Importantly, multiple processes contribute to behavioral responses. Here we investigated which processing stages are affected in children with dyslexia when performing visual motion processing tasks, by combining two methods that are sensitive to the dynamic processes leading to responses. We used a diffusion model which decomposes response time and accuracy into distinct cognitive constructs, and high-density EEG. Fifty children with dyslexia (24 male) and 50 typically developing children (28 male) 6-14 years of age judged the direction of motion as quickly and accurately as possible in two global motion tasks (motion coherence and direction integration), which varied in their requirements for noise exclusion. Following our preregistered analyses, we fitted hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to the data, blinded to group membership. Unblinding revealed reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia compared with typical children for both tasks. Additionally, we identified a response-locked EEG component which was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes which indicated a neural correlate of reduced drift rate in dyslexia in the motion coherence task, thereby linking brain and behavior. We suggest that children with dyslexia tend to be slower to extract sensory evidence from global motion displays, regardless of whether noise exclusion is required, thus furthering our understanding of atypical perceptual decision-making processes in dyslexia.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainChildDecision MakingDyslexiaElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMotion Perceptiondecision-makingdevelopmentdiffusion modelEEGmotion perceptionperception

Identifiers

PMID34782439
PMCPMC8741156
OpenAlexW3170265681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.