Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782347›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Seizure Prediction in Genetic Rat Models of Absence Epilepsy: Improved Performance through Multiple-Site Cortico-Thalamic Recordings Combined with Machine Learning.

Björn Budde, Vladimir Maksimenko, Kelvin Sarink, Thomas Seidenbecher, Gilles van Luijtelaar, Tim Hahn, Hans-Christian Pape, Annika Lüttjohann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. KArchiv der Pharmazie · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Memristive Neural Networks for Predicting Seizure Activity.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Björn BuddeInstitute of Physiology I, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Vladimir MaksimenkoNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Lab, Innopolis University, 42055 Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.
Kelvin SarinkInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Thomas SeidenbecherInstitute of Physiology I, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Gilles van LuijtelaarDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavoiur, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tim HahnInstitute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany annika.luettjohann@ukmuenster.de papechris@ukmuenster.de hahnt@wwu.de.
Hans-Christian PapeInstitute of Physiology I, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany annika.luettjohann@ukmuenster.de papechris@ukmuenster.de hahnt@wwu.de.
Annika LüttjohannInstitute of Physiology I, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany annika.luettjohann@ukmuenster.de papechris@ukmuenster.de hahnt@wwu.de.
University of Münster · DEInnopolis University · RURadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seizure prediction is the grand challenge of epileptology. However, effort was devoted to prediction of focal seizures, while generalized seizures were regarded as stochastic events. Long-lasting local field potential (LFP) recordings containing several hundred generalized spike and wave discharges (SWDs), acquired at eight locations in the cortico-thalamic system of absence epileptic rats, were iteratively analyzed in all possible combinations of either two or three recording sites, by a wavelet-based algorithm, calculating the product of the wavelet-energy signaling increases in synchronicity. Sensitivity and false alarm rate of prediction were compared between various combinations, and wavelet spectra of true and false positive predictions were fed to a random forest machine learning algorithm to further differentiate between them. Wavelet analysis of intracortical and cortico-thalamic LFP traces showed a significantly smaller number of false alarms compared with intrathalamic combinations, while predictions based on recordings in Layers IV, V, and VI of the somatosensory-cortex significantly outreached all other combinations in terms of prediction sensitivity. In 24-h out-of-sample recordings of nine Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), containing diurnal fluctuations of SWD occurrence, classification of true and false positives by the trained random forest further reduced the false alarm rate by 71%, although at some trade-off between false alarms and sensitivity of prediction, as reflected in relatively low F1 score values. Results provide support for the cortical-focus theory of absence epilepsy and allow the conclusion that SWDs are predictable to some degree. The latter paves the way for the development of closed-loop SWD prediction-prevention systems. Suggestions for a possible translation to human data are outlined.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, AbsenceAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectroencephalographyMachine LearningRatsSeizuresabsence epilepsyartificial neuronal networkGAERSrandom forestsomatosensory cortexspike and wave discharges

Identifiers

PMID34782347
PMCPMC8856717
OpenAlexW3214657382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.