Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782315›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Factors affecting the decision to investigate older adults with potential cancer symptoms: a systematic review.

Daniel Jones, Erica Di Martino, Stephen H Bradley, Blessing Essang, Scott Hemphill, Judy M Wright, Cristina Renzi, Claire Surr, Andrew Clegg, Niek De Wit and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Differences in clinical presentation and treatment decisions between frail and not-frail head and neck cancer patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Variations in the investigation of colorectal cancer-related symptoms in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patterns of diagnostic testing for oesophagogastric cancer-related symptoms in Australian primary care: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The LncRNA DUXAP10 Could Function as a Promising Oncogene in Human Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel JonesLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Erica Di MartinoLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Stephen H BradleyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Blessing EssangLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Scott HemphillLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Judy M WrightLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Cristina RenziUniversity College London, London, UK.
Claire SurrLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Niek De WitJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Richard NealSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder age and frailty increase the risk of morbidity and mortality from cancer surgery and intolerance of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The effect of old age on diagnostic intervals is unknown; however, older adults need a balanced approach to the diagnosis and management of cancer symptoms, considering the benefits of early diagnosis, patient preferences, and the likely prognosis of a cancer.

aimTo examine the association between older age and diagnostic processes for cancer, and the specific factors that affect diagnosis. DESIGN AND

settingA systematic literature review.

methodElectronic databases were searched for studies of patients aged >65 years presenting with cancer symptoms to primary care considering diagnostic decisions. Studies were analysed using thematic synthesis and according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines.

resultsData from 54 studies with 230 729 participants were included. The majority of studies suggested an association between increasing age and prolonged diagnostic interval or deferral of a decision to investigate cancer symptoms. Thematic synthesis highlighted three important factors that resulted in uncertainty in decisions involving older adults: presence of frailty, comorbidities, and cognitive impairment. Data suggested patients wished to be involved in decision making, but the presence of cognitive impairment and the need for additional time within a consultation were significant barriers.

conclusionThis systematic review has highlighted uncertainty in the management of older adults with cancer symptoms. Patients and their family wished to be involved in these decisions. Given the uncertainty regarding optimum management of this group of patients, a shared decision-making approach is important.

Indexed as

FrailtyNeoplasmsAgedDecision Making, SharedHumansPatient PreferenceUncertaintycancerdecision making, sharedearly detection of cancerfrail elderlyprimary health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34782315
PMCPMC8597772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.