Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782026›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2023

Sexual and reproductive health needs assessment and interventions in a female psychiatric intensive care unit.

Elana Covshoff, Lucy Blake, Elizabeth Mary Rose, Adenike Bolade, Robert Rathouse, Aleishia Wilson, Arthur Cotterell, Rudiger Pittrof, Faisil Sethi

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elana CovshoffGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-0640
Lucy BlakeSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Elizabeth Mary RoseSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6439-3438
Adenike BoladeSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Robert RathouseSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Aleishia WilsonSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Arthur CotterellSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Rudiger PittrofGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Faisil SethiDorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodTo assess the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of women admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU), and acceptability of delivering specialist SRH assessments and interventions in this setting. Within a quality improvement framework, staff were trained, a clinical protocol developed and clinical interventions made accessible.

resultsThirty per cent of women were identified as having unmet SRH needs and proceeded to a specialist appointment, representing a 2.5-fold increase in unmet need detection. Forty-two per cent of women were assessed, representing a 3.5-fold increase in uptake. Twenty-one per cent of women initiated SRH interventions, of which 14% had all their SRH needs met. Staff, patients and carers highlighted the acceptability and importance of SRH care, if interventions were appropriately timed and patients' individual risk profiles were considered. Barriers to access included lack of routine enquiry, illness acuity and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SRH needs for PICU admissions are greater than previously realised. Providing a nurse-led SRH assessment is acceptable, feasible and beneficial for PICU patients.

Indexed as

education and traininghuman rightsIn-patient treatmentpsychiatric nursingsexual and gender identity disorders

Identifiers

PMID34782026
PMCPMC10028536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.