Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34782024›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Robotic-based ACTive somatoSENSory (Act.Sens) retraining on upper limb functions with chronic stroke survivors: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Ananda Sidarta, Yu Chin Lim, Christopher Wee Keong Kuah, Yong Joo Loh, Wei Tech Ang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04490655 (Effectiveness of Robotic-based ACTive somatoSENSory), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04490655 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Robotic-based ACTive somatoSENSory (Act.Sens) Retraining on Upper Limb Functions: Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial With Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled9ConditionsStrokeArmsActive somatosensory training, Motor-based training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ananda SidartaRehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. ananda.sidarta@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-3137
Yu Chin LimRehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Christopher Wee Keong KuahRehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Yong Joo LohRehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Tech AngRehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Rehabilitation Research Institute of Singapore RFP/19002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have established that senses of the limb position in space (proprioception and kinaesthesia) are important for motor control and learning. Although nearly one-half of stroke patients have impairment in the ability to sense their movements, somatosensory retraining focusing on proprioception and kinaesthesia is often overlooked. Interventions that simultaneously target motor and somatosensory components are thought to be useful for relearning somatosensory functions while increasing mobility of the affected limb. For over a decade, robotic technology has been incorporated in stroke rehabilitation for more controlled therapy intensity, duration, and frequency. This pilot randomised controlled trial introduces a compact robotic-based upper-limb reaching task that retrains proprioception and kinaesthesia concurrently.

methodsThirty first-ever chronic stroke survivors (> 6-month post-stroke) will be randomly assigned to either a treatment or a control group. Over a 5-week period, the treatment group will receive 15 training sessions for about an hour per session. Robot-generated haptic guidance will be provided along the movement path as somatosensory cues while moving. Audio-visual feedback will appear following every successful movement as a reward. For the same duration, the control group will complete similar robotic training but without the vision occluded and robot-generated cues. Baseline, post-day 1, and post-day 30 assessments will be performed, where the last two sessions will be conducted after the last training session. Robotic-based performance indices and clinical assessments of upper limb functions after stroke will be used to acquire primary and secondary outcome measures respectively. This work will provide insights into the feasibility of such robot-assisted training clinically. DISCUSSION: The current work presents a study protocol to retrain upper-limb somatosensory and motor functions using robot-based rehabilitation for community-dwelling stroke survivors. The training promotes active use of the affected arm while at the same time enhances somatosensory input through augmented feedback. The outcomes of this study will provide preliminary data and help inform the clinicians on the feasibility and practicality of the proposed exercise.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04490655 . Registered 29 July 2020.

Indexed as

Haptic guidanceKinaesthesiaProprioceptionReward feedbackRobot-assisted training

Identifiers

PMID34782024
PMCPMC8591937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.