Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34781981›Full record

Trial reportTrials2021

Pre-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.

Berta Grau-Pujol, Daniel Camprubí-Ferrer, Helena Marti-Soler, Marc Fernández-Pardos, Clara Carreras-Abad, Maria Velasco-de Andrés, Elisabet Ferrer, Magdalena Muelas-Fernandez, Sophie Jullien, Giuseppe Barilaro and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331834 (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis With Hydroxychloroquine for High-Risk Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04331834 phase3completednot on this map

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis With Hydroxychloroquine for High-Risk Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicentre, Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBarcelona Institute for Global HealthRan2020 to 2020Enrolled275ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsHydroxychloroquine, Placebos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The relationship between hydroxychloroquine plasma concentration and COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19 chemoprevention.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Berta Grau-Pujol *Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. berta.grau@isglobal.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-0965
Daniel Camprubí-Ferrer *Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Helena Marti-SolerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc Fernández-PardosBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara Carreras-AbadBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Velasco-de AndrésBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet FerrerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Magdalena Muelas-FernandezBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Sophie JullienBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Giuseppe BarilaroBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara AjanovicBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel VeraBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura MorenoInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Gonzalez-RedondoInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria Cortes-SerraBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Montserrat RoldánBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Artes-de ArcosBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel MurInfectious Diseases Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere DomingoInfectious Diseases Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Felipe GarciaInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Caterina GuinovartBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose MuñozBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic - University of Barcelona, Rosselló 132 4rt 1a, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESManhiça Health Research Centre · MZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a promising strategy to break COVID-19 transmission. Although hydroxychloroquine was evaluated for treatment and post-exposure prophylaxis, it is not evaluated for COVID-19 PrEP yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PrEP with hydroxychloroquine against placebo in healthcare workers at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during an epidemic period.

methodsWe conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in three hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. From 350 adult healthcare workers screened, we included 269 participants with no active or past SARS-CoV-2 infection (determined by a negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR and a negative serology against SARS-CoV-2). Participants allocated in the intervention arm (PrEP) received 400 mg of hydroxychloroquine daily for the first four consecutive days and subsequently, 400 mg weekly during the study period. Participants in the control group followed the same treatment schedule with placebo tablets.

results52.8% (142/269) of participants were in the hydroxychloroquine arm and 47.2% (127/269) in the placebo arm. Given the national epidemic incidence decay, only one participant in each group was diagnosed with COVID-19. The trial was stopped due to futility and our study design was deemed underpowered to evaluate any benefit regarding PrEP efficacy. Both groups showed a similar proportion of participants experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) (p=0.548). No serious AEs were reported. Almost all AEs (96.4%, 106/110) were mild. Only mild gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly higher in the hydroxychloroquine arm compared to the placebo arm (27.4% (39/142) vs 15.7% (20/127), p=0.041).

conclusionsAlthough the efficacy of PrEP with hydroxychloroquine for preventing COVID-19 could not be evaluated, our study showed that PrEP with hydroxychloroquine at low doses is safe.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04331834 . Registered on April 2, 2020.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansHydroxychloroquineSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeHydroxychloroquineControlCOVID-19Health-care workersHydroxychloroquinePre-exposure prophylaxisPreventionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34781981
PMCPMC8591593
OpenAlexW3212784408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.